STXK vs. SCDS
STXK (Strive Small-Cap ETF) and SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. STXK is passively managed, while SCDS is actively managed. Over the past year, STXK returned 25.86% vs 42.67% for SCDS. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STXK charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCDS.
Performance
STXK vs. SCDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXK achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly lower than SCDS's 22.66% return.
STXK
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCDS
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 6M
- 21.54%
- 1Y
- 42.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STXK vs. SCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF | 10.46% | 7.82% | 7.63% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 22.66% | 11.27% | 7.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXK and SCDS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024 | 0.94 |
The correlation between STXK and SCDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXK vs. SCDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXK
SCDS
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
STXK
SCDS
Financial Services
STXK
SCDS
Industrials
STXK
SCDS
Consumer Cyclical
STXK
SCDS
Healthcare
STXK
SCDS
Real Estate
STXK
SCDS
Energy
STXK
SCDS
Basic Materials
STXK
SCDS
Utilities
STXK
SCDS
Consumer Defensive
STXK
SCDS
Communication Services
STXK
SCDS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXK vs. SCDS — Risk / Return Rank
STXK
SCDS
STXK vs. SCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXK | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 2.36 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 3.33 | -1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.40 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 4.84 | -2.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 16.84 | -7.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXK | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.36 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 1.11 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
STXK vs. SCDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXK drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, roughly equal to the maximum SCDS drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXK and SCDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXK | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.12% | -26.71% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -8.85% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -0.76% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -5.28% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.54% | +0.30% |
Volatility
STXK vs. SCDS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) is 4.21%, while JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that STXK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXK | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 5.58% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 12.93% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 18.20% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 21.20% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 21.20% | -1.08% |
STXK vs. SCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXK vs. SCDS - Dividend Comparison
STXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than SCDS's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 0.92% | 1.15% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF | 1.39% | 1.29% | 1.64% | 1.14% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, STXK and SCDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCDS has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to STXK (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXK dropped -27.12% vs SCDS's -26.71%.
On 1-year performance, SCDS leads with 42.67% vs 25.86% for STXK. On fees, STXK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXK has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCDS has performed better with a 42.67% return vs 25.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCDS.
STXK has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.92% for SCDS.
They also come from different issuers: Strive and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXK and 0.40% for SCDS.
SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXK and SCDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer