PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXE vs. OAEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

STXE vs. OAEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

STXE vs. OAEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
9.19%34.23%2.09%11.74%
OAEM
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
10.06%26.67%0.43%6.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXE achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than OAEM's 10.06% return.


STXE

1D
3.84%
1M
-10.86%
YTD
9.19%
6M
19.90%
1Y
47.19%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
10Y*

OAEM

1D
4.31%
1M
-10.94%
YTD
10.06%
6M
18.04%
1Y
41.48%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


STXE vs. OAEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than OAEM's 1.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

STXE vs. OAEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXE
STXE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

OAEM
OAEM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
OAEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
OAEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXE vs. OAEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STXEOAEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

1.86

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

2.48

+0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.36

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.78

+0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.92

12.06

+1.86

STXE vs. OAEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXE Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the OAEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXE and OAEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STXEOAEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

1.86

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.84

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between STXE and OAEM is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

STXE vs. OAEM - Dividend Comparison

STXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than OAEM's 0.70% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
2.46%2.66%3.22%1.08%0.00%
OAEM
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
0.70%0.77%0.91%1.63%0.04%

Drawdowns

STXE vs. OAEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXE drawdown since its inception was -18.92%, which is greater than OAEM's maximum drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXE and OAEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


STXEOAEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.92%

-17.05%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.51%

-14.63%

+0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.23%

-10.94%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-3.94%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.38%

+0.01%

Volatility

STXE vs. OAEM - Volatility Comparison

Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) have volatilities of 12.98% and 13.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


STXEOAEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.98%

13.45%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.36%

17.65%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.30%

22.39%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

19.00%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

19.00%

-2.63%