PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXE vs. FEMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXE vs. FEMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXE achieves a 31.48% return, which is significantly higher than FEMR's 22.16% return.


STXE

1D
2.93%
1M
-5.07%
6M
18.30%
YTD
31.48%
1Y
56.34%
3Y*
23.32%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.35%

FEMR

1D
1.39%
1M
-3.19%
6M
11.47%
YTD
22.16%
1Y
43.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
33.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.41M$1.90M$1.96M
$412.67K$566.81K$571.67K

STXE vs. FEMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
31.48%34.23%-2.38%
FEMR
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
22.16%35.27%-1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between STXE and FEMR is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.86

The correlation between STXE and FEMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXE vs. FEMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STXE
STXE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMR
FEMR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FEMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMR Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STXE vs. FEMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STXEFEMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.71

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.29

8.58

+1.71

STXE vs. FEMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the FEMR Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXE and FEMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STXE vs. FEMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXE drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, which is greater than FEMR's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXE and FEMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXEFEMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-15.58%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.38%

-15.48%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.59%

-11.03%

-3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-2.80%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.39%

4.87%

+0.52%

Volatility

STXE vs. FEMR - Volatility Comparison

Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a higher volatility of 13.05% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) at 9.05%. This indicates that STXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXEFEMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.05%

9.05%

+4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.09%

23.33%

+4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.83%

25.43%

+4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

23.28%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.17%

23.28%

-3.11%

STXE vs. FEMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMR's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

STXE vs. FEMR - Dividend Comparison

STXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than FEMR's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FEMR
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
1.56%1.92%0.37%0.00%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.91%2.66%3.22%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, STXE and FEMR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STXE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to FEMR (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXE dropped -20.38% vs FEMR's -15.58%.

On 1-year performance, STXE leads with 56.34% vs 43.13% for FEMR. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, FEMR has been the lower-risk option at 9.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, STXE has performed better with a 56.34% return vs 43.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FEMR.

STXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.56% for FEMR.

They also come from different issuers: Strive and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for STXE and 0.38% for FEMR.

STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXE and FEMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer