STRV vs. SPMO
STRV (Strive 500 ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STRV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Large Cap Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STRV returned 22.94%/yr vs 42.27%/yr for SPMO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STRV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
STRV vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRV achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.45% return.
STRV
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 11.36%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 28.33%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 10.84%
- YTD
- 28.45%
- 6M
- 27.50%
- 1Y
- 43.92%
- 3Y*
- 42.27%
- 5Y*
- 23.92%
- 10Y*
- 20.77%
STRV vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRV Strive 500 ETF | 11.36% | 17.95% | 25.13% | 27.70% | -1.96% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.45% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | 6.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRV and SPMO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between STRV and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
STRV vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STRV
SPMO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
STRV
SPMO
Communication Services
STRV
SPMO
Financial Services
STRV
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
STRV
SPMO
Healthcare
STRV
SPMO
Industrials
STRV
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
STRV
SPMO
Energy
STRV
SPMO
Utilities
STRV
SPMO
Basic Materials
STRV
SPMO
Real Estate
STRV
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRV vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
STRV
SPMO
STRV vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 500 ETF (STRV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STRV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.44 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.47 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.87 | 13.52 | +0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STRV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.49 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 1.00 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
STRV vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRV drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRV and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.00% | -30.95% | +11.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -12.70% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.00% | -20.13% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -1.46% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.26% | -4.60% | +2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 3.26% | -1.21% |
Volatility
STRV vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strive 500 ETF (STRV) is 2.72%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that STRV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 7.39% | -4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 14.49% | -5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 17.70% | -5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 19.30% | -3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 20.31% | -4.22% |
STRV vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
STRV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STRV vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
STRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.66% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
STRV Strive 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.21% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STRV and SPMO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to STRV (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRV dropped -19.00% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 3-year performance, SPMO leads with 42.27% vs 22.94% for STRV. On fees, STRV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, STRV has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 42.27% return vs 22.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STRV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.
STRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.66% for SPMO.
STRV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. STRV tracks Bloomberg US Large Cap Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for STRV and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRV and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer