STRT vs. ALV
STRT (Strattec Security Corporation) and ALV (Autoliv, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto Parts industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, STRT returned 7.69%/yr vs 6.41%/yr for ALV. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRT vs. ALV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRT achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly higher than ALV's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, STRT has outperformed ALV with an annualized return of 7.69%, while ALV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.41% annualized return.
STRT
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 38.88%
- 3Y*
- 66.34%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
ALV
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 9.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.58%
- 10Y*
- 6.41%
STRT vs. ALV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRT Strattec Security Corporation | 5.79% | 84.81% | 62.59% | 23.31% | -44.49% | -25.00% | 123.78% | -21.04% | -32.75% | 9.81% |
ALV Autoliv, Inc. | 1.71% | 30.24% | -12.72% | 47.99% | -23.47% | 14.50% | 9.99% | 24.32% | -21.57% | 14.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRT and ALV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 1997 | 0.17 |
Over the past year, STRT and ALV have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
STRT:
$332.91M
ALV:
$8.93B
STRT:
$6.06
ALV:
$9.32
STRT:
13.29
ALV:
12.76
STRT:
0.37
ALV:
0.68
STRT:
0.57
ALV:
0.82
STRT:
1.38
ALV:
3.39
STRT:
$579.58M
ALV:
$10.99B
STRT:
$97.12M
ALV:
$2.12B
STRT:
$36.69M
ALV:
$1.38B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRT vs. ALV — Risk / Return Rank
STRT
ALV
STRT vs. ALV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) and Autoliv, Inc. (ALV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRT | ALV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.08 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 0.43 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 1.18 | +1.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRT vs. ALV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRT drawdown since its inception was -89.98%, which is greater than ALV's maximum drawdown of -79.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRT and ALV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRT | ALV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.98% | -79.72% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.31% | -21.96% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.82% | -39.27% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.60% | -39.27% | -22.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.35% | -63.09% | -11.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.67% | -9.71% | -8.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.61% | -20.88% | -19.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.82% | 8.03% | +5.79% |
Volatility
STRT vs. ALV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) is 8.37%, while Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that STRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRT | ALV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 10.24% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.01% | 21.81% | +12.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.11% | 27.57% | +21.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.16% | 32.10% | +17.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.52% | 33.85% | +19.67% |
Dividends
STRT vs. ALV - Dividend Comparison
STRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALV Autoliv, Inc. | 2.91% | 2.63% | 2.92% | 2.41% | 3.37% | 1.82% | 0.67% | 2.94% | 3.02% | 1.87% | 2.03% | 1.78% |
STRT Strattec Security Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 2.52% | 1.94% | 1.29% | 1.34% | 0.89% |
Financials
STRT vs. ALV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Strattec Security Corporation and Autoliv, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRT vs. ALV - Profitability Comparison
STRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Strattec Security Corporation reported a gross profit of 22.66M and revenue of 137.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.5%.
ALV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autoliv, Inc. reported a gross profit of 526.00M and revenue of 2.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.
STRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Strattec Security Corporation reported an operating income of 5.05M and revenue of 137.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
ALV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autoliv, Inc. reported an operating income of 237.00M and revenue of 2.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.
STRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Strattec Security Corporation reported a net income of 3.24M and revenue of 137.63M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
ALV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autoliv, Inc. reported a net income of 142.00M and revenue of 2.75B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRT and ALV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALV has higher volatility (10.24%) compared to STRT (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRT dropped -89.98% vs ALV's -79.72%.
STRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRT and ALV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer