STRL vs. HWM
STRL (Sterling Construction Company, Inc.) and HWM (Howmet Aerospace Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — STRL in Engineering & Construction, HWM in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, STRL returned 68.46%/yr vs 31.79%/yr for HWM. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRL vs. HWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 191.24% return, which is significantly higher than HWM's 20.38% return. Over the past 10 years, STRL has outperformed HWM with an annualized return of 68.46%, while HWM has yielded a comparatively lower 31.79% annualized return.
STRL
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 191.24%
- 6M
- 174.74%
- 1Y
- 332.96%
- 3Y*
- 155.47%
- 5Y*
- 104.86%
- 10Y*
- 68.46%
HWM
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -8.87%
- YTD
- 20.38%
- 6M
- 27.45%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 75.58%
- 5Y*
- 48.17%
- 10Y*
- 31.79%
STRL vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc. | 191.24% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 20.38% | 87.95% | 102.71% | 37.84% | 24.16% | 11.67% | 21.03% | 83.54% | -37.43% | 48.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and HWM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, STRL and HWM have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
STRL:
$27.68B
HWM:
$99.36B
STRL:
$11.19
HWM:
$4.31
STRL:
79.71
HWM:
57.22
STRL:
1.70
HWM:
0.97
STRL:
9.58
HWM:
11.57
STRL:
23.27
HWM:
17.99
STRL:
$2.88B
HWM:
$8.62B
STRL:
$664.66M
HWM:
$2.81B
STRL:
$429.99M
HWM:
$2.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
HWM
STRL vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STRL | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.24 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.82 | 2.59 | +8.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.19 | 7.37 | +22.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STRL | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.13 | 1.34 | +2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.85 | 1.51 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.29 | 0.80 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.21 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
STRL vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, roughly equal to the maximum HWM drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and HWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -88.30% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.02% | -15.89% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.67% | -19.41% | -28.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | -22.40% | -25.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | -64.81% | +5.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.25% | -9.88% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.31% | -31.01% | -15.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.09% | 5.58% | +5.51% |
Volatility
STRL vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison
Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a higher volatility of 24.22% compared to Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) at 7.62%. This indicates that STRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.22% | 7.62% | +16.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.81% | 24.08% | +39.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.49% | 30.70% | +50.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.99% | 32.04% | +24.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.42% | 39.78% | +13.64% |
Dividends
STRL vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison
STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
STRL vs. HWM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and Howmet Aerospace Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRL vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
HWM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
HWM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
HWM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and HWM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (24.22%) compared to HWM (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs HWM's -88.30%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and HWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer