PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STRL vs. BRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STRL vs. BRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 180.50% return, which is significantly higher than BRO's -24.34% return. Over the past 10 years, STRL has outperformed BRO with an annualized return of 67.37%, while BRO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.86% annualized return.


STRL

1D
2.44%
1M
0.55%
YTD
180.50%
6M
172.57%
1Y
320.41%
3Y*
152.83%
5Y*
104.12%
10Y*
67.37%

BRO

1D
0.07%
1M
10.32%
YTD
-24.34%
6M
-26.12%
1Y
-43.33%
3Y*
-1.70%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
13.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STRL vs. BRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
180.50%81.79%91.57%168.08%24.71%41.32%32.17%29.29%-33.11%92.43%
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
-24.34%-21.37%44.32%25.73%-18.39%49.31%21.06%44.67%8.30%16.15%

Correlation

The correlation between STRL and BRO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.18

The correlation between STRL and BRO shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

STRL:

$11.19

BRO:

$4.76

PE Ratio

STRL:

76.77

BRO:

12.59

PEG Ratio

STRL:

1.63

BRO:

0.92

PS Ratio

STRL:

9.22

BRO:

2.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

STRL:

$2.88B

BRO:

$6.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STRL:

$664.66M

BRO:

$3.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

STRL:

$429.99M

BRO:

$1.51B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STRL vs. BRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STRL
STRL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BRO
BRO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRO Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STRL vs. BRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STRLBRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

0.71

+0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.41

-0.86

+11.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.52

-1.44

+29.96

STRL vs. BRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STRL Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the BRO Sharpe Ratio of -1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STRL and BRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STRL vs. BRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than BRO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and BRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STRLBRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.51%

-55.85%

-36.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.02%

-50.55%

+19.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.67%

-55.85%

+8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.67%

-55.85%

+8.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.60%

-55.85%

-3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.56%

-51.29%

+37.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.29%

-13.54%

-32.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.30%

30.12%

-18.82%

Volatility

STRL vs. BRO - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a higher volatility of 27.60% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) at 8.65%. This indicates that STRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STRLBRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.60%

8.65%

+18.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.26%

21.99%

+43.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.41%

28.46%

+53.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.29%

24.82%

+32.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.58%

23.70%

+29.88%

Dividends

STRL vs. BRO - Dividend Comparison

STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
1.08%0.77%0.53%0.67%0.74%0.54%0.73%0.82%1.11%1.08%1.12%1.41%
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

STRL vs. BRO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Brown & Brown, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
825.68M
1.90B
(STRL) Total Revenue
(BRO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STRL vs. BRO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Brown & Brown, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
23.5%
52.3%
Portfolio components
STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

BRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a gross profit of 994.00M and revenue of 1.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

BRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

BRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a net income of 426.00M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STRL and BRO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STRL has higher volatility (27.60%) compared to BRO (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs BRO's -55.85%.

STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs -1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STRL and BRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer