STRL vs. BMNR
STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) and BMNR (BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while BMNR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past year, STRL returned 320.41% vs 187.25% for BMNR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRL vs. BMNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 180.50% return, which is significantly higher than BMNR's -40.66% return.
STRL
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 180.50%
- 6M
- 172.57%
- 1Y
- 320.41%
- 3Y*
- 152.83%
- 5Y*
- 104.12%
- 10Y*
- 67.37%
BMNR
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -23.94%
- YTD
- -40.66%
- 6M
- -53.79%
- 1Y
- 187.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STRL vs. BMNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 180.50% | 58.01% |
BMNR BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. | -40.66% | 274.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and BMNR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
STRL:
$26.66B
BMNR:
$7.32T
STRL:
$11.19
BMNR:
-$0.06
STRL:
9.22
BMNR:
146.26K
STRL:
22.41
BMNR:
742.94
STRL:
$2.88B
BMNR:
$16.71M
STRL:
$664.66M
BMNR:
$1.15M
STRL:
$429.99M
BMNR:
-$3.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. BMNR — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
BMNR
STRL vs. BMNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRL | BMNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.97 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.41 | 2.13 | +8.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.52 | 2.56 | +25.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRL vs. BMNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, roughly equal to the maximum BMNR drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and BMNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | BMNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -88.41% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.02% | -88.41% | +57.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.56% | -88.06% | +74.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.29% | -70.84% | +24.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.30% | 73.42% | -62.12% |
Volatility
STRL vs. BMNR - Volatility Comparison
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a higher volatility of 27.60% compared to BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) at 22.82%. This indicates that STRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | BMNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.60% | 22.82% | +4.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.26% | 60.99% | +4.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.41% | 717.57% | -635.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.29% | 710.73% | -653.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.58% | 710.73% | -657.15% |
Dividends
STRL vs. BMNR - Dividend Comparison
STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BMNR BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.04% |
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
STRL vs. BMNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and BMNR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (27.60%) compared to BMNR (22.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs BMNR's -88.41%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and BMNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer