PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STRGX vs. BIBTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STRGX vs. BIBTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Stratton Mid Cap Value Fund (STRGX) and Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STRGX achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than BIBTX's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, STRGX has outperformed BIBTX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while BIBTX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.03% annualized return.


STRGX

1D
1.00%
1M
3.07%
YTD
20.07%
6M
18.12%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
10.65%

BIBTX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.94%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.67%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
2.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STRGX vs. BIBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STRGX
Sterling Capital Stratton Mid Cap Value Fund
20.07%5.40%9.49%14.39%-10.92%23.49%3.74%32.73%-14.28%21.75%
BIBTX
Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund
0.32%6.93%2.17%5.53%-13.24%-1.21%9.24%9.29%-0.34%4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between STRGX and BIBTX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 1999

-0.12

The correlation between STRGX and BIBTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STRGX vs. BIBTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STRGX
STRGX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
STRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
STRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBTX
BIBTX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BIBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STRGX vs. BIBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Stratton Mid Cap Value Fund (STRGX) and Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STRGXBIBTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.57

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.45

4.33

+6.12

STRGX vs. BIBTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STRGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the BIBTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STRGX and BIBTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STRGX vs. BIBTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STRGX drawdown since its inception was -53.50%, which is greater than BIBTX's maximum drawdown of -18.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRGX and BIBTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STRGXBIBTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.50%

-18.28%

-35.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.79%

-3.05%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.88%

-6.33%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.22%

-18.28%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.35%

-18.28%

-23.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-1.50%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-2.38%

-5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

1.10%

+1.48%

Volatility

STRGX vs. BIBTX - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital Stratton Mid Cap Value Fund (STRGX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) at 1.28%. This indicates that STRGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STRGXBIBTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

1.28%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

2.96%

+8.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

3.95%

+10.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

5.82%

+11.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

4.89%

+14.25%

STRGX vs. BIBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STRGX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBTX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

STRGX vs. BIBTX - Dividend Comparison

STRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, more than BIBTX's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIBTX
Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund
4.26%4.09%4.11%3.17%2.82%3.15%4.03%3.12%3.22%3.00%3.27%3.55%
STRGX
Sterling Capital Stratton Mid Cap Value Fund
8.36%10.04%15.16%12.43%17.98%8.18%0.84%5.40%9.91%3.79%0.60%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


STRGX and BIBTX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STRGX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to BIBTX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRGX dropped -53.50% vs BIBTX's -18.28%.

STRGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STRGX and BIBTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer