PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIBTX vs. STMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIBTX vs. STMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) and Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund (STMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIBTX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than STMDX's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, BIBTX has underperformed STMDX with an annualized return of 2.04%, while STMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.59% annualized return.


BIBTX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.36%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
0.16%
10Y*
2.04%

STMDX

1D
-1.96%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
8.75%
6M
7.94%
1Y
7.94%
3Y*
8.84%
5Y*
2.61%
10Y*
6.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIBTX vs. STMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIBTX
Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund
0.32%6.93%2.17%5.53%-13.24%-1.21%9.24%9.29%-0.34%4.34%
STMDX
Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund
8.75%1.35%6.25%13.28%-26.17%38.53%-0.54%31.77%-2.82%7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BIBTX and STMDX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 1999

0.02

Over the past year, BIBTX and STMDX have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIBTX vs. STMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIBTX
BIBTX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BIBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

STMDX
STMDX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
STMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
STMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
STMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
STMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIBTX vs. STMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) and Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund (STMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIBTXSTMDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

0.63

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

0.93

+0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.12

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.05

+0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.39

2.95

+2.44

BIBTX vs. STMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIBTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the STMDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIBTX and STMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIBTXSTMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

0.63

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.14

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.32

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.39

+0.54

Drawdowns

BIBTX vs. STMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIBTX drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, smaller than the maximum STMDX drawdown of -65.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBTX and STMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIBTXSTMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.28%

-65.12%

+46.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-7.70%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.33%

-16.98%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.28%

-33.43%

+15.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.28%

-40.52%

+22.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-3.80%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-10.09%

+7.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

2.74%

-1.71%

Volatility

BIBTX vs. STMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) is 1.35%, while Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund (STMDX) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that BIBTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIBTXSTMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

3.78%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

9.20%

-6.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01%

12.84%

-8.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

18.72%

-12.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.89%

20.41%

-15.52%

BIBTX vs. STMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIBTX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than STMDX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIBTX vs. STMDX - Dividend Comparison

BIBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than STMDX's 5.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIBTX
Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund
4.26%4.09%4.11%3.17%2.82%3.15%4.03%3.12%3.22%3.00%3.27%3.55%
STMDX
Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund
5.83%6.24%7.14%8.39%8.29%7.14%4.05%9.15%5.92%4.80%7.98%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIBTX and STMDX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STMDX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to BIBTX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIBTX dropped -18.28% vs STMDX's -65.12%.

BIBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIBTX and STMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer