BIBTX vs. STMDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) and Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund (STMDX).
BIBTX is managed by Sterling Capital. It was launched on Dec 2, 1999. STMDX is managed by Sterling Capital. It was launched on May 30, 1980.
Performance
BIBTX vs. STMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIBTX vs. STMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBTX Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund | -0.70% | 6.93% | 2.17% | 5.53% | -13.24% | -1.21% | 9.24% | 9.29% | -0.34% | 4.34% |
STMDX Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund | 1.24% | 1.35% | 6.25% | 13.28% | -26.17% | 38.53% | -0.54% | 31.77% | -2.82% | 7.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIBTX achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than STMDX's 1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, BIBTX has underperformed STMDX with an annualized return of 2.09%, while STMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.92% annualized return.
BIBTX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
STMDX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- -0.18%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- 5.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIBTX vs. STMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIBTX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than STMDX's 0.82% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIBTX vs. STMDX — Risk / Return Rank
BIBTX
STMDX
BIBTX vs. STMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) and Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund (STMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIBTX | STMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 0.05 | +0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 0.18 | +1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.02 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 0.07 | +1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 0.26 | +4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIBTX | STMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.05 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.18 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.29 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.38 | +0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIBTX and STMDX is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BIBTX vs. STMDX - Dividend Comparison
BIBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than STMDX's 6.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBTX Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund | 3.79% | 4.09% | 4.11% | 3.17% | 2.82% | 3.15% | 4.03% | 3.12% | 3.22% | 3.00% | 3.27% | 3.55% |
STMDX Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund | 6.27% | 6.24% | 7.14% | 8.39% | 8.29% | 7.14% | 4.05% | 9.15% | 5.92% | 4.80% | 7.98% | 2.96% |
Drawdowns
BIBTX vs. STMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIBTX drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, smaller than the maximum STMDX drawdown of -65.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBTX and STMDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIBTX | STMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.28% | -65.12% | +46.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -12.22% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.28% | -33.43% | +15.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.28% | -40.52% | +22.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -8.82% | +6.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -10.12% | +7.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 3.18% | -2.15% |
Volatility
BIBTX vs. STMDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) is 1.61%, while Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund (STMDX) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that BIBTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIBTX | STMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 4.16% | -2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.61% | 8.87% | -6.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46% | 15.78% | -11.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 18.73% | -12.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.87% | 20.41% | -15.54% |