BIBTX vs. STSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) and Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund (STSCX).
BIBTX is managed by Sterling Capital. It was launched on Dec 2, 1999. STSCX is managed by Sterling Capital. It was launched on Apr 12, 1993.
Performance
BIBTX vs. STSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIBTX vs. STSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBTX Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund | -0.70% | 6.93% | 2.17% | 5.53% | -13.24% | -1.21% | 9.24% | 9.29% | -0.34% | 4.34% |
STSCX Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund | 3.75% | 11.87% | 13.78% | 19.04% | -14.45% | 31.59% | 3.18% | 33.00% | -14.38% | 13.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIBTX achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than STSCX's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, BIBTX has underperformed STSCX with an annualized return of 2.09%, while STSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.
BIBTX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
STSCX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -7.29%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 23.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIBTX vs. STSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIBTX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than STSCX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIBTX vs. STSCX — Risk / Return Rank
BIBTX
STSCX
BIBTX vs. STSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) and Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund (STSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIBTX | STSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.15 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.71 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.24 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 1.55 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 6.50 | -1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIBTX | STSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.15 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.43 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.52 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.57 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIBTX and STSCX is -0.16. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BIBTX vs. STSCX - Dividend Comparison
BIBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than STSCX's 19.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBTX Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund | 3.79% | 4.09% | 4.11% | 3.17% | 2.82% | 3.15% | 4.03% | 3.12% | 3.22% | 3.00% | 3.27% | 3.55% |
STSCX Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund | 19.54% | 20.28% | 23.71% | 39.14% | 27.85% | 23.34% | 16.67% | 13.04% | 9.11% | 9.20% | 5.09% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
BIBTX vs. STSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIBTX drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, smaller than the maximum STSCX drawdown of -54.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBTX and STSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIBTX | STSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.28% | -54.02% | +35.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -13.84% | +10.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.28% | -25.48% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.28% | -44.28% | +26.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -8.46% | +5.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -8.21% | +5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 3.30% | -2.27% |
Volatility
BIBTX vs. STSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) is 1.61%, while Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund (STSCX) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that BIBTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIBTX | STSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 5.08% | -3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.61% | 11.65% | -9.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46% | 20.64% | -16.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 20.05% | -14.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.87% | 22.10% | -17.23% |