STPZ vs. MUNI
STPZ (PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF) and MUNI (PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - STPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y), while MUNI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. STPZ is passively managed, while MUNI is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, STPZ returned 2.82%/yr vs 1.97%/yr for MUNI. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. STPZ charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MUNI.
Performance
STPZ vs. MUNI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STPZ achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than MUNI's 0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, STPZ has outperformed MUNI with an annualized return of 2.82%, while MUNI has yielded a comparatively lower 1.97% annualized return.
STPZ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 2.60%
- 3Y*
- 4.85%
- 5Y*
- 2.62%
- 10Y*
- 2.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.41%
MUNI
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 1.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.68M | $16.13M | $16.68M | |
| $3.45M | $3.35M | $4.10M |
STPZ vs. MUNI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 1.47% | 6.40% | 4.30% | 4.28% | -4.49% | 5.64% | 5.44% | 4.83% | 0.04% | 0.51% |
MUNI PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 0.45% | 4.72% | 1.43% | 6.07% | -6.62% | 0.67% | 4.83% | 7.09% | 0.84% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between STPZ and MUNI is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2009 | 0.31 |
The correlation between STPZ and MUNI shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.48 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STPZ vs. MUNI — Risk / Return Rank
STPZ
MUNI
STPZ vs. MUNI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) and PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MUNI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STPZ | MUNI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 1.84 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.50 | 5.37 | +2.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STPZ vs. MUNI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STPZ drawdown since its inception was -6.77%, smaller than the maximum MUNI drawdown of -11.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STPZ and MUNI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STPZ | MUNI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -11.15% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.93% | -2.29% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.35% | -3.67% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.70% | -11.02% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.77% | -11.15% | +4.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -1.57% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -1.72% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 0.78% | -0.43% |
Volatility
STPZ vs. MUNI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) is 0.46%, while PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MUNI) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that STPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUNI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STPZ | MUNI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | 0.86% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.44% | 1.83% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87% | 2.31% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 3.33% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 3.85% | -0.87% |
STPZ vs. MUNI - Expense Ratio Comparison
STPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MUNI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
STPZ vs. MUNI - Dividend Comparison
STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than MUNI's 3.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUNI PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 3.37% | 3.26% | 3.50% | 3.09% | 2.13% | 1.62% | 1.92% | 2.44% | 2.38% | 2.37% | 2.37% | 2.20% |
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 5.27% | 3.65% | 1.97% | 1.63% | 5.88% | 3.65% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.23% | 1.51% | 0.65% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STPZ and MUNI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUNI has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to STPZ (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STPZ dropped -6.77% vs MUNI's -11.15%.
On 10-year performance, STPZ leads with 2.82% vs 1.97% for MUNI. On fees, STPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, STPZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, STPZ has performed better with a 2.82% return vs 1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MUNI.
STPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 3.37% for MUNI.
STPZ is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while MUNI is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for STPZ and 0.35% for MUNI.
MUNI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STPZ and MUNI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer