STPZ vs. IBIC
STPZ (PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - STPZ tracks the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y) while IBIC tracks the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, STPZ returned 4.51% vs 4.54% for IBIC. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STPZ charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
STPZ vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STPZ achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.37% return.
STPZ
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STPZ vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 1.79% | 6.40% | 4.30% | 2.29% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.37% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between STPZ and IBIC is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between STPZ and IBIC has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STPZ vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
STPZ
IBIC
STPZ vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STPZ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 2.24 | -0.76 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 17.27 | -12.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.28 | 67.45 | -51.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STPZ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 5.05 | -2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 3.49 | -2.59 |
Drawdowns
STPZ vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STPZ drawdown since its inception was -6.77%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STPZ and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STPZ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -0.90% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.93% | -0.26% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.13% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -0.10% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 0.07% | +0.21% |
Volatility
STPZ vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) has a higher volatility of 0.46% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that STPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STPZ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | 0.33% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.20% | 0.67% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83% | 0.90% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.29% | 1.58% | +1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 1.58% | +1.40% |
STPZ vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
STPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STPZ vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 4.10% | 3.65% | 1.97% | 1.63% | 5.88% | 3.65% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.23% | 1.51% | 0.65% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STPZ and IBIC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STPZ has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STPZ dropped -6.77% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.54% vs 4.51% for STPZ. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.54% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for STPZ.
STPZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.
STPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y), while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for STPZ and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STPZ and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer