STOX vs. BDGS

Last updated Jul 9, 2026

STOX (Horizon Core Equity ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, STOX returned 21.77% vs 11.73% for BDGS. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STOX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

STOX vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Core Equity ETF (STOX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STOX achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.43% return.

STOX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: 8.22%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 1Y: 21.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.56%
• 6M: 5.30%
• YTD: 5.43%
• 1Y: 11.73%
• 3Y*: 13.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STOX vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STOX Horizon Core Equity ETF	9.35%	13.00%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.43%	6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between STOX and BDGS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.82

The correlation between STOX and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

STOX vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STOX

STOX Risk / Return Rank: 66
STOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
STOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
STOX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
STOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
STOX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STOX vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Core Equity ETF (STOX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STOX	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.86	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.78	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.37	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	2.92	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.62	11.95	-1.33

STOX vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STOX and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STOX vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STOX drawdown since its inception was -9.33%, roughly equal to the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOX and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	STOX	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.33%	-9.12%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	-4.03%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-1.01%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.20%	-0.67%	-0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	0.98%	+1.07%

Volatility

STOX vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Core Equity ETF (STOX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.38%. This indicates that STOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STOX	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	2.38%	+1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.86%	5.27%	+4.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.71%	6.34%	+6.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.70%	8.20%	+4.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.70%	8.20%	+4.50%

STOX vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

STOX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

STOX vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

STOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than BDGS's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
STOX Horizon Core Equity ETF	0.17%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STOX and BDGS in my portfolio?

STOX and BDGS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STOX or BDGS?

STOX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to BDGS (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STOX dropped -9.33% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, STOX or BDGS?

On 1-year performance, STOX leads with 21.77% vs 11.73% for BDGS. On fees, STOX is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STOX or BDGS?

Over the 1-year period, STOX has performed better with a 21.77% return vs 11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STOX or BDGS?

STOX is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STOX or BDGS?

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.17% for STOX.

What is the main difference between STOX and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for STOX and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.