PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STOX vs. BDGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STOX vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Core Equity ETF (STOX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STOX achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 2.70% return.


STOX

1D
0.43%
1M
1.84%
6M
6.61%
YTD
9.05%
1Y
18.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.18%

BDGS

1D
-0.66%
1M
-1.21%
6M
2.08%
YTD
2.70%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
12.58%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.15K$243.61K$187.93K
$905.82K$921.25K$857.62K

STOX vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
STOX
Horizon Core Equity ETF
9.05%13.00%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
2.70%6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between STOX and BDGS is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.81

The correlation between STOX and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STOX vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STOX
STOX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
STOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
STOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
STOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
STOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STOX vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Core Equity ETF (STOX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STOXBDGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.93

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.90

7.35

+1.54

STOX vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STOX and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STOX vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STOX drawdown since its inception was -9.33%, roughly equal to the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOX and BDGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STOXBDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.33%

-9.12%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-4.03%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-3.58%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-0.68%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.06%

+1.02%

Volatility

STOX vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Core Equity ETF (STOX) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.88%. This indicates that STOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STOXBDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

1.88%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

5.51%

+4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

6.54%

+6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.57%

8.18%

+4.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.57%

8.18%

+4.39%

STOX vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

STOX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

STOX vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

STOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than BDGS's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.54%0.55%1.81%0.84%
STOX
Horizon Core Equity ETF
0.17%0.19%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STOX and BDGS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STOX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to BDGS (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STOX dropped -9.33% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

On 1-year performance, STOX leads with 18.43% vs 7.76% for BDGS. On fees, STOX is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 1.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, STOX has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STOX is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.17% for STOX.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for STOX and 0.87% for BDGS.

STOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STOX and BDGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer