PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STOT vs. USTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STOT vs. USTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STOT achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than USTB's 1.19% return.


STOT

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.26%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
2.43%

USTB

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.58%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STOT vs. USTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
0.97%5.56%5.26%6.39%-3.75%0.27%2.43%4.40%0.95%0.09%
USTB
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
1.19%6.08%6.49%6.69%-2.82%0.90%5.12%5.10%1.08%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between STOT and USTB is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.46

The correlation between STOT and USTB shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STOT vs. USTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STOT
STOT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
STOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
STOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
STOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

USTB
USTB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
USTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
USTB Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
USTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
USTB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STOT vs. USTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STOTUSTBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.81

3.93

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.93

6.69

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.88

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

5.65

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.02

25.66

-1.63

STOT vs. USTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STOT Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is comparable to the USTB Sharpe Ratio of 3.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STOT and USTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STOTUSTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81

3.93

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.63

1.75

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

1.73

-0.62

Drawdowns

STOT vs. USTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STOT drawdown since its inception was -6.07%, which is greater than USTB's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOT and USTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STOTUSTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-5.32%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-0.84%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

-1.02%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.07%

-4.96%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.04%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-0.66%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

0.19%

-0.01%

Volatility

STOT vs. USTB - Volatility Comparison

State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB) have volatilities of 0.33% and 0.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STOTUSTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

0.33%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.84%

0.84%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11%

1.22%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.73%

2.01%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.20%

2.01%

+0.19%

STOT vs. USTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

STOT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than USTB's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

STOT vs. USTB - Dividend Comparison

STOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than USTB's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
4.41%4.52%5.10%4.53%2.54%1.76%1.66%2.61%2.50%1.95%2.08%
USTB
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
4.58%4.62%5.05%4.49%2.54%1.84%2.59%2.69%2.32%0.43%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STOT and USTB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USTB has higher volatility (0.33%) compared to STOT (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STOT dropped -6.07% vs USTB's -5.32%.

On 5-year performance, USTB leads with 3.50% vs 2.81% for STOT. On fees, USTB is cheaper at 0.34% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USTB has performed better with a 3.50% return vs 2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USTB is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for STOT.

USTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 4.41% for STOT.

STOT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index, while USTB tracks Bloomberg 1–3 Year Credit Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for STOT and 0.34% for USTB.

USTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs 3.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STOT and USTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer