STOT vs. DDV
STOT (State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STOT is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index, while DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds. STOT is passively managed, while DDV is actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STOT charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
STOT vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STOT achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.12% return.
STOT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
DDV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STOT vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STOT State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 1.08% | 0.62% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.12% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between STOT and DDV is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STOT vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
STOT
DDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
STOT vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STOT | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.23 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STOT vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STOT drawdown since its inception was -6.07%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOT and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STOT | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -1.92% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.32% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.83% | -0.35% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | — | — |
Volatility
STOT vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STOT | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13% | 2.69% | -1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 2.69% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.20% | 2.69% | -0.49% |
STOT vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
STOT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
STOT vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
STOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STOT State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 4.40% | 4.52% | 5.10% | 4.53% | 2.54% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 1.95% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STOT and DDV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for STOT.
STOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.
STOT is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for STOT and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for STOT and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer