PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STNG vs. IXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STNG vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STNG achieves a 57.90% return, which is significantly higher than IXC's 23.35% return. Over the past 10 years, STNG has underperformed IXC with an annualized return of 8.38%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.83% annualized return.


STNG

1D
4.03%
1M
4.14%
6M
46.43%
YTD
57.90%
1Y
79.55%
3Y*
24.33%
5Y*
34.53%
10Y*
8.38%

IXC

1D
0.51%
1M
-4.24%
6M
20.68%
YTD
23.35%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
18.91%
10Y*
8.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STNG vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
57.90%6.03%-16.29%15.40%325.48%17.40%-70.74%127.09%-41.26%-31.93%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
23.35%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between STNG and IXC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010

0.41

The correlation between STNG and IXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STNG vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STNG
STNG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
STNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
STNG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
STNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
STNG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STNG vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STNGIXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

1.95

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

6.26

+2.65

STNG vs. IXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STNG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the IXC Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STNG and IXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STNG vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STNG drawdown since its inception was -91.13%, which is greater than IXC's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNG and IXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STNGIXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.13%

-67.88%

-23.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.74%

-15.36%

-7.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.97%

-19.06%

-41.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.97%

-24.93%

-36.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.67%

-64.16%

-17.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.12%

-11.22%

+3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.15%

-17.45%

-31.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.90%

4.78%

+4.12%

Volatility

STNG vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison

Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) has a higher volatility of 12.53% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 6.59%. This indicates that STNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STNGIXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.53%

6.59%

+5.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.31%

15.86%

+12.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.59%

19.18%

+19.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.01%

23.45%

+21.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.21%

26.81%

+27.40%

Dividends

STNG vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

STNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than IXC's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
3.08%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
2.17%3.19%3.22%1.73%0.74%3.12%3.57%1.02%2.27%1.31%11.04%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


STNG and IXC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STNG has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to IXC (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNG dropped -91.13% vs IXC's -67.88%.

STNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STNG and IXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer