PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STMSX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STMSX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund (STMSX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STMSX achieves a 13.21% return, which is significantly higher than WFSPX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, STMSX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 9.35%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


STMSX

1D
1.05%
1M
2.23%
YTD
13.21%
6M
13.30%
1Y
26.59%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
9.35%

WFSPX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.80%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.72%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
14.24%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STMSX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STMSX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund
13.21%8.67%13.34%12.97%-16.91%23.68%10.41%21.99%-12.34%15.89%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
11.69%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between STMSX and WFSPX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.88

The correlation between STMSX and WFSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (3 years) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STMSX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STMSX
STMSX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
STMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
STMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
STMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
STMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STMSX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund (STMSX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STMSXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.35

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.15

15.65

-5.51

STMSX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STMSX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STMSXWFSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.52

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.85

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.87

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.13

+0.21

Drawdowns

STMSX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STMSX drawdown since its inception was -60.78%, roughly equal to the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STMSX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STMSXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.78%

-58.21%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-8.90%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.36%

-18.74%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.36%

-24.51%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-33.74%

-9.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

0.00%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-12.77%

+2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

1.90%

+0.87%

Volatility

STMSX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund (STMSX) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) at 2.82%. This indicates that STMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STMSXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

2.82%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

8.97%

+3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

11.85%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.10%

16.88%

+6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.88%

18.02%

+4.86%

STMSX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STMSX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

STMSX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

STMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than WFSPX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STMSX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund
3.82%4.41%21.88%3.11%0.84%9.68%0.29%2.54%9.26%1.89%0.41%0.25%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
1.56%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


STMSX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STMSX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to WFSPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STMSX dropped -60.78% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STMSX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer