PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STM vs. SNOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STM vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STM achieves a 176.58% return, which is significantly higher than SNOW's 19.19% return.


STM

1D
0.10%
1M
-8.42%
6M
148.77%
YTD
176.58%
1Y
123.79%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
29.42%

SNOW

1D
-2.26%
1M
8.76%
6M
19.33%
YTD
19.19%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
-0.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STM vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
STM
STMicroelectronics N.V.
176.58%5.28%-49.67%41.66%-26.76%32.39%18.52%
SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
19.19%42.06%-22.41%38.64%-57.63%20.38%14.86%

Correlation

The correlation between STM and SNOW is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between STM and SNOW has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STM:

$63.77B

SNOW:

$90.62B

EPS

STM:

$0.15

SNOW:

-$3.53

PS Ratio

STM:

5.46

SNOW:

17.63

PB Ratio

STM:

3.72

SNOW:

43.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

STM:

$12.40B

SNOW:

$5.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STM:

$4.20B

SNOW:

$3.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

STM:

$2.32B

SNOW:

-$1.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STM vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STM
STM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
STM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
STM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
STM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
STM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SNOW
SNOW Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SNOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOW Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STM vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STMSNOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.14

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

0.39

+2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

0.84

+6.50

STM vs. SNOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STM Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the SNOW Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STM and SNOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STM vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STM drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than SNOW's maximum drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STM and SNOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STMSNOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.40%

-72.99%

-21.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.35%

-56.30%

+19.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.66%

-56.30%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.66%

-72.99%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.47%

-34.94%

+24.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.08%

-48.89%

-6.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.12%

26.10%

-9.98%

Volatility

STM vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison

STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has a higher volatility of 22.31% compared to Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) at 12.19%. This indicates that STM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STMSNOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.31%

12.19%

+10.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.40%

53.30%

-8.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.14%

66.06%

-9.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.82%

61.97%

-16.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.53%

62.49%

-17.96%

Dividends

STM vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison

STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while SNOW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STM
STMicroelectronics N.V.
0.50%1.39%1.32%0.48%0.67%0.45%0.50%0.89%1.73%0.98%2.10%5.11%

Financials

STM vs. SNOW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between STMicroelectronics N.V. and Snowflake Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
3.10B
1.39B
(STM) Total Revenue
(SNOW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STM vs. SNOW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between STMicroelectronics N.V. and Snowflake Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
33.8%
66.6%
Portfolio components
STM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 3.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.8%.

SNOW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.

STM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported an operating income of 96.00M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

SNOW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.

STM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a net income of 37.00M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.

SNOW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STM and SNOW have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STM has higher volatility (22.31%) compared to SNOW (12.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STM dropped -94.40% vs SNOW's -72.99%.

STM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STM and SNOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer