STLDX vs. FFFHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

STLDX (BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund) and FFFHX (Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, STLDX returned 8.00%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for FFFHX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STLDX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FFFHX.

Performance

STLDX vs. FFFHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund (STLDX) and Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STLDX achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly lower than FFFHX's 13.62% return. Over the past 10 years, STLDX has underperformed FFFHX with an annualized return of 8.00%, while FFFHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.41% annualized return.

STLDX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 8.07%
• 1Y: 16.74%
• 3Y*: 10.97%
• 5Y*: 5.05%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

FFFHX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 5.06%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 15.48%
• 1Y: 31.03%
• 3Y*: 20.61%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 12.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STLDX vs. FFFHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
STLDX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund	7.53%	13.59%	3.65%	15.65%	-15.85%	11.43%	13.06%	22.09%	-5.41%	15.48%
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund	13.62%	23.72%	14.11%	20.45%	-18.29%	16.59%	18.25%	25.33%	-8.90%	22.29%

Correlation

The correlation between STLDX and FFFHX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2006	0.95

The correlation between STLDX and FFFHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

STLDX vs. FFFHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STLDX

STLDX Risk / Return Rank: 56
STLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
STLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
STLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
STLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
STLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FFFHX

FFFHX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FFFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FFFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FFFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FFFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FFFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STLDX vs. FFFHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund (STLDX) and Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STLDX	FFFHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.48	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	3.41	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.46	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	3.25	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	14.45	-1.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STLDX vs. FFFHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STLDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FFFHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STLDX and FFFHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STLDX	FFFHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	2.48	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.70	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.81	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.47	+0.04

Drawdowns

STLDX vs. FFFHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STLDX drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum FFFHX drawdown of -56.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLDX and FFFHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	STLDX	FFFHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.43%	-56.38%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.60%	-9.70%	+4.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.58%	-15.36%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.56%	-27.39%	+4.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.95%	-30.91%	+3.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-8.83%	+0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.29%	2.18%	-0.89%

Volatility

STLDX vs. FFFHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund (STLDX) is 2.47%, while Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that STLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFFHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STLDX	FFFHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.47%	4.25%	-1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.35%	10.46%	-4.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.94%	12.71%	-4.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.22%	15.00%	-3.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.30%	15.38%	-4.08%

STLDX vs. FFFHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STLDX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFHX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

STLDX vs. FFFHX - Dividend Comparison

STLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than FFFHX's 5.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund	5.27%	4.14%	1.86%	1.78%	11.83%	11.76%	4.93%	6.48%	7.69%	3.98%	4.12%	4.16%
STLDX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund	3.80%	4.09%	0.96%	3.16%	2.04%	16.80%	3.86%	6.33%	13.50%	12.92%	2.00%	9.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STLDX and FFFHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, STLDX and FFFHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, STLDX or FFFHX?

FFFHX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to STLDX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLDX dropped -48.43% vs FFFHX's -56.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.