STLAP.PA vs. AMZN.NEO
STLAP.PA (Stellantis NV) and AMZN.NEO (Amazon.com CDR) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — STLAP.PA in Auto Manufacturers, AMZN.NEO in Internet Retail. Over the past 3 years, STLAP.PA returned -23.54%/yr vs 18.26%/yr for AMZN.NEO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STLAP.PA vs. AMZN.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
STLAP.PA is traded in EUR, while AMZN.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AMZN.NEO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLAP.PA achieves a -35.21% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN.NEO's 4.78% return.
STLAP.PA
- 1D
- 3.22%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- -35.21%
- 6M
- -39.70%
- 1Y
- -28.18%
- 3Y*
- -23.54%
- 5Y*
- -13.14%
- 10Y*
- 6.73%
AMZN.NEO
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -8.38%
- YTD
- 4.78%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 9.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STLAP.PA vs. AMZN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLAP.PA Stellantis NV | -35.21% | -18.98% | -36.15% | 74.00% | -14.10% | 4.91% |
AMZN.NEO Amazon.com CDR | 4.78% | -5.17% | 39.38% | 77.58% | -50.85% | -8.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between STLAP.PA and AMZN.NEO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2021 | 0.20 |
The correlation between STLAP.PA and AMZN.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STLAP.PA vs. AMZN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
STLAP.PA
AMZN.NEO
STLAP.PA vs. AMZN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellantis NV (STLAP.PA) and Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STLAP.PA | AMZN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.08 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 0.44 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 1.01 | -2.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STLAP.PA vs. AMZN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLAP.PA drawdown since its inception was -94.49%, which is greater than AMZN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -56.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLAP.PA and AMZN.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STLAP.PA | AMZN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.49% | -56.95% | -37.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.88% | -22.08% | -24.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.30% | -33.52% | -42.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.90% | -12.23% | -61.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.96% | -20.93% | -30.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.39% | 9.69% | +14.70% |
Volatility
STLAP.PA vs. AMZN.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Stellantis NV (STLAP.PA) has a higher volatility of 10.88% compared to Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) at 7.92%. This indicates that STLAP.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STLAP.PA | AMZN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.88% | 7.92% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.26% | 20.15% | +21.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.57% | 30.57% | +20.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.14% | 35.69% | +2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.25% | 35.69% | +77.56% |
Dividends
STLAP.PA vs. AMZN.NEO - Dividend Comparison
Neither STLAP.PA nor AMZN.NEO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN.NEO Amazon.com CDR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STLAP.PA Stellantis NV | 0.00% | 7.23% | 12.26% | 6.34% | 7.84% | 13.53% | 0.00% | 29.82% |
Financials
STLAP.PA vs. AMZN.NEO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stellantis NV and Amazon.com CDR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
STLAP.PA and AMZN.NEO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for STLAP.PA and AMZN.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer