STIP vs. REET
STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) and REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L), while REET is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, STIP returned 3.14%/yr vs 4.50%/yr for REET. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STIP charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for REET.
Performance
STIP vs. REET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STIP achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, STIP has underperformed REET with an annualized return of 3.14%, while REET has yielded a comparatively higher 4.50% annualized return.
STIP
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.14%
REET
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 4.50%
STIP vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.87% | 6.03% | 4.77% | 4.63% | -3.02% | 5.68% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 0.54% | 0.74% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 12.42% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | -10.48% | 24.42% | -5.27% | 7.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between STIP and REET is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2014 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STIP vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank
STIP
REET
STIP vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STIP | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.22 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.63 | 1.67 | +4.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.91 | 6.00 | +19.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STIP vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STIP drawdown since its inception was -5.50%, smaller than the maximum REET drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STIP and REET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STIP | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -44.59% | +39.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.69% | -9.04% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.95% | -18.02% | +17.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.50% | -32.11% | +26.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.50% | -44.59% | +39.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | 0.00% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.99% | -9.76% | +8.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 2.52% | -2.34% |
Volatility
STIP vs. REET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) is 0.41%, while iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that STIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STIP | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | 4.16% | -3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.01% | 9.07% | -8.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45% | 12.31% | -10.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 16.97% | -14.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.45% | 18.85% | -16.40% |
STIP vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison
STIP has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than REET's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STIP vs. REET - Dividend Comparison
STIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than REET's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.31% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STIP and REET have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REET has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to STIP (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STIP dropped -5.50% vs REET's -44.59%.
On 10-year performance, REET leads with 4.50% vs 3.14% for STIP. On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, STIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, REET has performed better with a 4.50% return vs 3.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for REET.
STIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 3.29% for REET.
STIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while REET is REIT. STIP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L), while REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for STIP and 0.14% for REET.
STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STIP and REET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer