PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STIP vs. ALLW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

STIP vs. ALLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

STIP vs. ALLW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
1.02%4.01%
ALLW
SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF
4.95%15.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STIP achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than ALLW's 4.95% return.


STIP

1D
0.05%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.38%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
3.11%

ALLW

1D
1.98%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
4.95%
6M
8.24%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


STIP vs. ALLW - Expense Ratio Comparison

STIP has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ALLW's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

STIP vs. ALLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STIP
STIP Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
STIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
STIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
STIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ALLW
ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STIP vs. ALLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STIPALLWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

1.53

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.34

2.06

+1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.31

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

2.34

+1.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.63

10.17

+4.46

STIP vs. ALLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STIP Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the ALLW Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STIP and ALLW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STIPALLWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.53

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

1.51

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between STIP and ALLW is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

STIP vs. ALLW - Dividend Comparison

STIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than ALLW's 4.45% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
3.93%4.11%2.62%2.84%6.04%4.15%1.40%2.06%2.44%1.59%0.89%
ALLW
SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF
4.45%4.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

STIP vs. ALLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STIP drawdown since its inception was -5.50%, smaller than the maximum ALLW drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STIP and ALLW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


STIPALLWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-8.78%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.95%

-8.78%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-4.28%

+4.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-1.18%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

2.02%

-1.74%

Volatility

STIP vs. ALLW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) is 0.59%, while SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that STIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


STIPALLWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

5.41%

-4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.97%

8.56%

-7.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83%

13.08%

-11.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.76%

12.83%

-10.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.45%

12.83%

-10.38%