STFGX vs. QIACX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

STFGX (State Farm Growth Fund) and QIACX (Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, STFGX returned 13.54%/yr vs 16.60%/yr for QIACX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. STFGX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for QIACX.

Performance

STFGX vs. QIACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STFGX achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly higher than QIACX's 8.33% return. Over the past 10 years, STFGX has underperformed QIACX with an annualized return of 13.54%, while QIACX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.60% annualized return.

STFGX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -1.06%
• 6M: 7.79%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 1Y: 25.89%
• 3Y*: 18.38%
• 5Y*: 12.69%
• 10Y*: 13.54%
• ALL TIME*: 9.84%

QIACX

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: 0.84%
• 6M: 8.37%
• YTD: 8.33%
• 1Y: 16.33%
• 3Y*: 22.32%
• 5Y*: 14.88%
• 10Y*: 16.60%
• ALL TIME*: 11.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
STFGX State Farm Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

STFGX vs. QIACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
STFGX State Farm Growth Fund	11.87%	19.19%	20.85%	17.49%	-11.27%	25.90%	15.65%	28.02%	-5.35%	16.60%
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund	8.33%	21.15%	31.07%	23.52%	-14.16%	31.40%	21.95%	26.91%	-2.64%	21.07%

Correlation

The correlation between STFGX and QIACX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003	0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between STFGX and QIACX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

STFGX vs. QIACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STFGX

STFGX Risk / Return Rank: 84
STFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
STFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
STFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
STFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
STFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

QIACX

QIACX Risk / Return Rank: 53
QIACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
QIACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QIACX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QIACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QIACX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STFGX vs. QIACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STFGX	QIACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.26	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	1.85	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.25	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	1.86	+0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.34	8.04	+4.30

STFGX vs. QIACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STFGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the QIACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STFGX and QIACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STFGX vs. QIACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STFGX drawdown since its inception was -48.88%, smaller than the maximum QIACX drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STFGX and QIACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	STFGX	QIACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.88%	-60.11%	+11.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	-8.65%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.65%	-19.41%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.65%	-23.05%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.46%	-36.47%	+5.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-0.21%	-1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.80%	-9.24%	+1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	2.00%	-0.05%

Volatility

STFGX vs. QIACX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) is 2.75%, while Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that STFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QIACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STFGX	QIACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	3.12%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.33%	10.04%	-0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.96%	12.78%	-0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.03%	17.45%	-1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.75%	18.64%	-1.89%

STFGX vs. QIACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STFGX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QIACX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

STFGX vs. QIACX - Dividend Comparison

STFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than QIACX's 4.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund	4.23%	4.58%	8.65%	1.40%	10.90%	17.44%	3.01%	3.34%	8.60%	0.69%	1.12%	1.25%
STFGX State Farm Growth Fund	5.77%	6.42%	8.96%	6.39%	0.96%	15.49%	2.81%	3.33%	4.11%	3.40%	3.39%	13.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STFGX and QIACX in my portfolio?

STFGX and QIACX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STFGX or QIACX?

QIACX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to STFGX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STFGX dropped -48.88% vs QIACX's -60.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.