PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIACX vs. AQGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QIACX vs. AQGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) and AQR Global Equity Fund (AQGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIACX achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than AQGIX's 13.92% return. Over the past 10 years, QIACX has outperformed AQGIX with an annualized return of 17.01%, while AQGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.50% annualized return.


QIACX

1D
0.60%
1M
3.49%
YTD
8.03%
6M
10.30%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
25.32%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
17.01%

AQGIX

1D
1.38%
1M
6.92%
YTD
13.92%
6M
15.98%
1Y
34.48%
3Y*
28.48%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
13.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIACX vs. AQGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QIACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund
8.03%21.15%31.07%23.52%-14.16%31.40%21.95%26.91%-2.64%21.07%
AQGIX
AQR Global Equity Fund
13.92%31.64%24.56%22.92%-14.14%18.32%9.33%22.55%-14.50%25.44%

Correlation

The correlation between QIACX and AQGIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between QIACX and AQGIX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QIACX vs. AQGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIACX
QIACX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QIACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIACX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
QIACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIACX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

AQGIX
AQGIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AQGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AQGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIACX vs. AQGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) and AQR Global Equity Fund (AQGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QIACXAQGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

2.68

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

3.71

-0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.61

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.70

16.59

-2.89

QIACX vs. AQGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIACX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the AQGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIACX and AQGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QIACXAQGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.68

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.86

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.75

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.63

-0.05

Drawdowns

QIACX vs. AQGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIACX drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than AQGIX's maximum drawdown of -35.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIACX and AQGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QIACXAQGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-35.47%

-24.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-9.88%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-18.50%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

-29.62%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

-35.47%

-1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-6.55%

-2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.15%

-0.31%

Volatility

QIACX vs. AQGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) is 2.56%, while AQR Global Equity Fund (AQGIX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that QIACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AQGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QIACXAQGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

3.30%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

10.25%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

13.34%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

18.24%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

17.96%

+0.74%

QIACX vs. AQGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIACX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AQGIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

QIACX vs. AQGIX - Dividend Comparison

QIACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than AQGIX's 11.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQGIX
AQR Global Equity Fund
11.57%13.18%13.59%5.97%4.39%12.17%1.16%1.41%4.72%5.05%10.34%0.09%
QIACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund
4.24%4.58%8.65%1.40%10.90%17.44%3.01%3.34%8.60%0.69%1.12%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


QIACX and AQGIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AQGIX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to QIACX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIACX dropped -60.11% vs AQGIX's -35.47%.

AQGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIACX and AQGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer