PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STFGX vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STFGX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STFGX achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's 10.19% return. Over the past 10 years, STFGX has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 14.02%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.


STFGX

1D
0.93%
1M
0.71%
YTD
12.03%
6M
11.74%
1Y
32.55%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
14.02%

FXAIX

1D
1.09%
1M
0.47%
YTD
10.19%
6M
9.68%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
14.10%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STFGX vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STFGX
State Farm Growth Fund
12.03%19.19%20.85%17.49%-11.27%25.90%15.65%28.02%-5.35%16.60%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
10.19%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between STFGX and FXAIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011

0.94

The correlation between STFGX and FXAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STFGX vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STFGX
STFGX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
STFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
STFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
STFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
STFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STFGX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STFGXFXAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.39

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.04

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.97

13.75

+3.22

STFGX vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STFGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STFGX and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STFGX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STFGX drawdown since its inception was -48.88%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STFGX and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STFGXFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.88%

-33.79%

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-8.89%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.65%

-18.76%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-24.50%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.46%

-33.79%

+2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-1.36%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-3.79%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.96%

-0.04%

Volatility

STFGX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) is 3.85%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that STFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STFGXFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

4.77%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

9.91%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

12.47%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

17.01%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

18.11%

-1.31%

STFGX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STFGX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

STFGX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

STFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than FXAIX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.04%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%
STFGX
State Farm Growth Fund
5.77%6.42%8.96%6.39%0.96%15.49%2.81%3.33%4.11%3.40%3.39%13.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, STFGX and FXAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FXAIX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to STFGX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STFGX dropped -48.88% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

STFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STFGX and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer