STEN vs. JULB
STEN (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. STEN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
STEN vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STEN achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly higher than JULB's 6.35% return.
STEN
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 7.79%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STEN vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STEN iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF | 7.79% | 2.89% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 6.35% | 2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between STEN and JULB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STEN vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STEN | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.67 | 2.17 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
STEN vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STEN drawdown since its inception was -6.21%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STEN and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STEN | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -5.24% | -0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.07% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -0.87% | -0.05% |
Volatility
STEN vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STEN | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.24% | 6.81% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 6.81% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 6.81% | +2.43% |
STEN vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
STEN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
STEN vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
STEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STEN iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF | 0.29% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, STEN and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for STEN.
STEN has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.
They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for STEN and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for STEN and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer