STEN vs. BLCV

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

STEN (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF) and BLCV (Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STEN is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BLCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STEN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BLCV.

Performance

STEN vs. BLCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

STEN

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 2.21%
• 6M: 7.40%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STEN vs. BLCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STEN iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF	8.76%	2.36%
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	6.47%	4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between STEN and BLCV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.70

Return for Risk

STEN vs. BLCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	STEN	BLCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	STEN	BLCV	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.28%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.28%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.28%	—	—

STEN vs. BLCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

STEN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCV's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

STEN vs. BLCV - Dividend Comparison

STEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while BLCV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	1.01%	1.37%	1.63%	1.02%
STEN iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF	0.29%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STEN and BLCV in my portfolio?

STEN and BLCV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, STEN or BLCV?

On fees, STEN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, STEN or BLCV?

STEN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BLCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STEN or BLCV?

BLCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.29% for STEN.

What is the main difference between STEN and BLCV?

STEN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BLCV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for STEN and 0.55% for BLCV.