STEN vs. BLCV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

STEN (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF) and BLCV (Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STEN is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BLCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STEN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BLCV.

Performance

STEN vs. BLCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with STEN having a 7.79% return and BLCV slightly lower at 7.47%.

STEN

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 7.79%
• 6M: 8.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCV

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 3.44%
• YTD: 7.47%
• 6M: 9.37%
• 1Y: 21.57%
• 3Y*: 18.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STEN vs. BLCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STEN iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF	7.79%	2.05%
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	7.47%	4.40%

Correlation

The correlation between STEN and BLCV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

STEN vs. BLCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCV

BLCV Risk / Return Rank: 52
BLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 53
BLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STEN vs. BLCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STEN	BLCV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.67	1.47	+0.19

Drawdowns

STEN vs. BLCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STEN drawdown since its inception was -6.21%, smaller than the maximum BLCV drawdown of -13.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STEN and BLCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	STEN	BLCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-13.44%	+7.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.92%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-0.12%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.92%	-2.04%	+1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	STEN	BLCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.24%	11.52%	-2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.24%	12.77%	-3.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.24%	12.77%	-3.53%

STEN vs. BLCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

STEN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCV's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

STEN vs. BLCV - Dividend Comparison

STEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than BLCV's 1.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	1.26%	1.37%	1.63%	1.02%
STEN iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF	0.29%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STEN and BLCV in my portfolio?

STEN and BLCV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, STEN or BLCV?

On fees, STEN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, STEN or BLCV?

STEN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BLCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STEN or BLCV?

BLCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.29% for STEN.

What is the main difference between STEN and BLCV?

STEN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BLCV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for STEN and 0.55% for BLCV.