STEM vs. KULR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Stem, Inc. (STEM) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR).

Performance

STEM vs. KULR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stem, Inc. (STEM) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

STEM vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
STEM Stem, Inc.	-41.26%	24.79%	-84.46%	-56.60%	-52.87%	-7.28%	110.93%
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	-19.93%	-89.58%	1,818.92%	-84.58%	-56.52%	87.76%	5.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap STEM : $75.05M KULR : $97.50M
EPS STEM : $16.30 KULR : -$0.57
PS Ratio STEM : 0.48 KULR : 5.59
Total Revenue (TTM) STEM : $156.27M KULR : $16.68M
Gross Profit (TTM) STEM : $59.96M KULR : $3.69M
EBITDA (TTM) STEM : $171.02M KULR : -$20.99M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STEM achieves a -41.26% return, which is significantly lower than KULR's -19.93% return.

STEM

• 1D: 7.15%
• 1M: -15.89%
• YTD: -41.26%
• 6M: -49.54%
• 1Y: 26.18%
• 3Y*: -57.28%
• 5Y*: -56.05%
• 10Y*: —

KULR

• 1D: 9.22%
• 1M: -15.66%
• YTD: -19.93%
• 6M: -43.03%
• 1Y: -77.56%
• 3Y*: -30.36%
• 5Y*: -34.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

STEM vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STEM

STEM Risk / Return Rank: 53
STEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
STEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
STEM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
STEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
STEM Martin Ratio Rank: 47

KULR

KULR Risk / Return Rank: 9
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 8
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STEM vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stem, Inc. (STEM) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STEM	KULR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	-0.81	+1.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	-1.49	+2.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.83	+0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.18	-0.96	+1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.36	-1.30	+1.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STEM vs. KULR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the KULR Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STEM and KULR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STEM	KULR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21	-0.81	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.49	-0.28	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	-0.15	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between STEM and KULR is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

STEM vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison

Neither STEM nor KULR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

STEM vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STEM drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, roughly equal to the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STEM and KULR.

Drawdown Indicators

	STEM	KULR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.41%	-97.23%	-2.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.31%	-83.15%	+10.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.20%	-96.86%	-2.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.12%	-93.83%	-5.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.48%	-65.61%	-12.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.58%	61.26%	-24.68%

Volatility

STEM vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison

Stem, Inc. (STEM) has a higher volatility of 30.31% compared to KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) at 17.82%. This indicates that STEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STEM	KULR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.31%	17.82%	+12.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	78.86%	69.85%	+9.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	127.80%	96.84%	+30.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	114.40%	124.57%	-10.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	118.33%	126.43%	-8.10%

Financials