STCE vs. QSOL
STCE (Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF) and QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STCE is a Blockchain fund tracking the Schwab Crypto Thematic Index, while QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STCE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QSOL.
Performance
STCE vs. QSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STCE achieves a 32.00% return, which is significantly higher than QSOL's -41.51% return.
STCE
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- 16.12%
- YTD
- 32.00%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 84.98%
- 3Y*
- 58.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QSOL
- 1D
- -4.67%
- 1M
- -14.50%
- YTD
- -41.51%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STCE vs. QSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STCE Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF | 32.00% | -3.01% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -41.51% | -0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between STCE and QSOL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STCE vs. QSOL — Risk / Return Rank
STCE
QSOL
STCE vs. QSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STCE | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STCE | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | -0.99 | +1.64 |
Drawdowns
STCE vs. QSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STCE drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than QSOL's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STCE and QSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STCE | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.11% | -50.82% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.63% | -50.82% | +25.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.98% | -31.98% | +10.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.87% | — | — |
Volatility
STCE vs. QSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STCE | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.14% | 70.59% | -9.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.86% | 70.59% | -14.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.86% | 70.59% | -14.73% |
STCE vs. QSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
STCE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QSOL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
STCE vs. QSOL - Dividend Comparison
STCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than QSOL's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STCE Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF | 1.49% | 1.96% | 0.64% | 0.31% | 1.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STCE and QSOL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for STCE.
STCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.20% for QSOL.
STCE is categorized as Blockchain, while QSOL is Cryptocurrency. STCE tracks Schwab Crypto Thematic Index, while QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for STCE and 0.25% for QSOL.
Find the right allocation for STCE and QSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer