STBQ vs. SILJ

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

STBQ (Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STBQ is a Blockchain fund managed by Amplify, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

STBQ vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF (STBQ) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STBQ achieves a -19.28% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's -6.32% return.

STBQ

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -6.80%
• YTD: -19.28%
• 6M: -19.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SILJ

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -16.14%
• YTD: -6.32%
• 6M: -7.86%
• 1Y: 78.43%
• 3Y*: 44.49%
• 5Y*: 13.48%
• 10Y*: 6.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STBQ vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STBQ Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF	-19.28%	-1.97%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	-6.32%	-4.54%

Correlation

The correlation between STBQ and SILJ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

STBQ vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STBQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 41
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STBQ vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF (STBQ) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STBQ	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.37	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.01	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.72	—

Drawdowns

STBQ vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STBQ drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STBQ and SILJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	STBQ	SILJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.10%	-79.04%	+45.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-39.16%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.68%	-35.68%	+9.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.05%	-41.38%	+22.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	STBQ	SILJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	48.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.26%	57.53%	-14.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.26%	44.96%	-1.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.26%	46.43%	-3.17%

Dividends

STBQ vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

STBQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	2.14%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%
STBQ Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STBQ and SILJ in my portfolio?

STBQ and SILJ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STBQ or SILJ?

SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for STBQ.

What is the main difference between STBQ and SILJ?

STBQ is categorized as Blockchain, while SILJ is Silver.