PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ST vs. DGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ST vs. DGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ST achieves a 61.83% return, which is significantly higher than DGX's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ST has underperformed DGX with an annualized return of 4.32%, while DGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.82% annualized return.


ST

1D
0.79%
1M
30.55%
YTD
61.83%
6M
63.80%
1Y
104.55%
3Y*
9.18%
5Y*
-1.48%
10Y*
4.32%

DGX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.13%
YTD
12.60%
6M
7.01%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ST vs. DGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ST
Sensata Technologies Holding plc
61.83%23.53%-26.08%-5.87%-34.05%16.97%-2.10%20.14%-12.27%31.22%
DGX
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
12.60%17.20%11.77%-10.05%-7.80%47.86%14.11%31.13%-13.84%9.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ST and DGX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between ST and DGX has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ST:

$7.85B

DGX:

$21.69B

EPS

ST:

$0.33

DGX:

$9.10

PE Ratio

ST:

162.08

DGX:

21.28

PS Ratio

ST:

2.11

DGX:

1.93

PB Ratio

ST:

2.75

DGX:

2.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

ST:

$3.73B

DGX:

$11.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ST:

$1.04B

DGX:

$3.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

ST:

$711.50M

DGX:

$1.98B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ST vs. DGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ST
ST Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ST Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ST Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DGX
DGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ST vs. DGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.13

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.22

1.18

+6.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.27

2.48

+15.79

ST vs. DGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ST Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the DGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ST and DGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

0.60

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.49

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.50

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.53

-0.31

Drawdowns

ST vs. DGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ST drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, which is greater than DGX's maximum drawdown of -49.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ST and DGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.75%

-49.46%

-22.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.56%

-11.55%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.56%

-16.57%

-44.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.75%

-28.62%

-43.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.75%

-36.60%

-35.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.93%

-8.21%

-4.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.79%

-11.90%

-10.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

5.50%

+0.24%

Volatility

ST vs. DGX - Volatility Comparison

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) has a higher volatility of 14.88% compared to Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) at 4.81%. This indicates that ST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.88%

4.81%

+10.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.24%

16.42%

+12.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.23%

22.57%

+16.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.54%

21.73%

+14.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.87%

23.76%

+11.11%

Dividends

ST vs. DGX - Dividend Comparison

ST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than DGX's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGX
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
1.68%1.82%1.96%2.02%1.66%1.40%1.85%1.99%2.34%1.83%1.72%2.07%
ST
Sensata Technologies Holding plc
0.90%1.44%1.75%1.25%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ST vs. DGX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sensata Technologies Holding plc and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
934.80M
2.90B
(ST) Total Revenue
(DGX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ST vs. DGX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sensata Technologies Holding plc and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
30.6%
32.5%
Portfolio components
ST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sensata Technologies Holding plc reported a gross profit of 286.30M and revenue of 934.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.6%.

DGX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated reported a gross profit of 942.00M and revenue of 2.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

ST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sensata Technologies Holding plc reported an operating income of 141.60M and revenue of 934.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

DGX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated reported an operating income of 399.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.

ST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sensata Technologies Holding plc reported a net income of 87.10M and revenue of 934.80M, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.

DGX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated reported a net income of 252.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ST and DGX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ST has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to DGX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ST dropped -71.75% vs DGX's -49.46%.

ST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ST and DGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer