PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ST vs. DGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ST vs. DGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ST achieves a 41.49% return, which is significantly higher than DGX's 35.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ST has underperformed DGX with an annualized return of 2.69%, while DGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.


ST

1D
1.14%
1M
3.26%
6M
32.38%
YTD
41.49%
1Y
58.59%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
-3.27%
10Y*
2.69%
ALL TIME*
6.36%

DGX

1D
-0.45%
1M
7.96%
6M
26.44%
YTD
35.41%
1Y
38.15%
3Y*
21.95%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
12.68%
ALL TIME*
16.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$322.82M$244.31M$194.90M
$97.97M$81.94M$102.84M

ST vs. DGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ST
Sensata Technologies Holding plc
41.49%23.53%-26.08%-5.87%-34.05%16.97%-2.10%20.14%-12.27%31.22%
DGX
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
35.41%17.20%11.77%-10.05%-7.80%47.86%14.11%31.13%-13.84%9.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ST and DGX is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between ST and DGX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ST:

$6.81B

DGX:

$25.60B

EPS

ST:

$0.61

DGX:

$9.46

PE Ratio

ST:

76.41

DGX:

24.52

PS Ratio

ST:

1.82

DGX:

2.25

PB Ratio

ST:

2.32

DGX:

3.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

ST:

$3.78B

DGX:

$11.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ST:

$1.07B

DGX:

$3.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

ST:

$553.02M

DGX:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ST vs. DGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ST
ST Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ST Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ST Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DGX
DGX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ST vs. DGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.32

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.94

7.15

+0.79

ST vs. DGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ST Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the DGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ST and DGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ST vs. DGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ST drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, which is greater than DGX's maximum drawdown of -49.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ST and DGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.75%

-49.46%

-22.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.00%

-11.55%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.40%

-12.44%

-45.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.75%

-28.62%

-43.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.75%

-36.60%

-35.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.87%

-1.69%

-22.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.79%

-11.85%

-10.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.40%

5.35%

+2.05%

Volatility

ST vs. DGX - Volatility Comparison

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) have volatilities of 9.73% and 10.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.73%

10.22%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.36%

18.36%

+13.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.05%

23.78%

+17.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.05%

22.35%

+14.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.94%

24.00%

+10.94%

Dividends

ST vs. DGX - Dividend Comparison

ST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than DGX's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGX
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
1.43%1.82%1.96%2.02%1.66%1.40%1.85%1.99%2.34%1.83%1.72%2.07%
ST
Sensata Technologies Holding plc
1.03%1.44%1.75%1.25%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ST vs. DGX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sensata Technologies Holding plc and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ST vs. DGX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sensata Technologies Holding plc and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sensata Technologies Holding plc reported a gross profit of 301.80M and revenue of 990.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.

DGX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 3.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.8%.

ST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sensata Technologies Holding plc reported an operating income of 165.40M and revenue of 990.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.

DGX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated reported an operating income of 459.00M and revenue of 3.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

ST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sensata Technologies Holding plc reported a net income of 102.10M and revenue of 990.60M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

DGX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated reported a net income of 320.00M and revenue of 3.04B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ST and DGX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGX has higher volatility (10.22%) compared to ST (9.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ST dropped -71.75% vs DGX's -49.46%.

DGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ST and DGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer