SSS vs. MFUL
SSS (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSS is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the S&P 500 and S&P Solana 75/25 Blend Index, while MFUL is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Mohr. SSS is passively managed, while MFUL is actively managed. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SSS charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MFUL.
Performance
SSS vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SSS
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MFUL
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.28K | $15.36K | $11.55K | |
| $18.61K | $12.62K | $40.74K |
SSS vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF | -1.62% |
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSS and MFUL is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSS vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank
SSS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MFUL
SSS vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSS | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSS vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSS drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum MFUL drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSS and MFUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSS | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.64% | -16.41% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -0.11% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.37% | -9.19% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.93% | — |
Volatility
SSS vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSS | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.89% | 4.36% | +18.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 4.28% | +18.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 4.28% | +18.61% |
SSS vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSS vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison
SSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than MFUL's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 2.39% | 3.31% | 2.59% | 5.00% | 0.29% |
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSS and MFUL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSS is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSS is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.
MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.09% for SSS.
SSS is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MFUL is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSS and 1.10% for MFUL.
Find the right allocation for SSS and MFUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer