PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSS vs. INCM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSS vs. INCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SSS

1D
1.21%
1M
0.48%
6M
2.77%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

INCM

1D
0.65%
1M
1.46%
6M
3.97%
YTD
8.35%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.97M$12.34M$11.57M
$18.61K$12.62K$40.74K

SSS vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SSS and INCM is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSS vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


INCM
INCM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSS vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSSINCMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.34

SSS vs. INCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSS vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSS drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, which is greater than INCM's maximum drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSS and INCM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSSINCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-7.84%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

0.00%

-2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-1.07%

-5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

Volatility

SSS vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSSINCMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.89%

5.52%

+17.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

7.22%

+15.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.89%

7.22%

+15.67%

SSS vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSS vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison

SSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than INCM's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
5.15%4.96%5.06%3.01%
SSS
CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF
0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSS and INCM have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, INCM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INCM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSS.

INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 0.09% for SSS.

SSS is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while INCM is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSS and 0.38% for INCM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSS and INCM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer