PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSS vs. GXLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSS vs. GXLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and Grayscale Stellar Lumens Trust (XLM) (GXLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SSS

1D
1.21%
1M
0.48%
6M
2.77%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

GXLM

1D
0.25%
1M
5.28%
6M
37.21%
YTD
24.57%
1Y
-32.80%
3Y*
-9.51%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-21.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$130.54K$144.99K$229.86K
$18.61K$12.62K$40.74K

SSS vs. GXLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SSS and GXLM is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSS vs. GXLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GXLM
GXLM Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GXLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLM Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSS vs. GXLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and Grayscale Stellar Lumens Trust (XLM) (GXLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSSGXLMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

SSS vs. GXLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSS vs. GXLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSS drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum GXLM drawdown of -94.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSS and GXLM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSSGXLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-94.01%

+79.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-72.47%

+70.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-70.47%

+64.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

54.63%

Volatility

SSS vs. GXLM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSSGXLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.89%

95.09%

-72.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

147.21%

-124.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.89%

147.21%

-124.32%

SSS vs. GXLM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GXLM's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSS vs. GXLM - Dividend Comparison

SSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while GXLM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SSS and GXLM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SSS is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSS is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GXLM.

SSS has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for GXLM.

They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSS and 2.50% for GXLM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSS and GXLM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer