GXLM vs. ETHD
GXLM (Grayscale Stellar Lumens Trust (XLM)) and ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GXLM returned -45.29% vs -2.31% for ETHD. At a correlation of -0.56, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GXLM vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLM achieves a 22.71% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 27.90% return.
GXLM
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -11.84%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 22.71%
- 1Y
- -45.29%
- 3Y*
- -21.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- -23.52%
- 6M
- 61.71%
- YTD
- 27.90%
- 1Y
- -2.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXLM vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GXLM Grayscale Stellar Lumens Trust (XLM) | 22.71% | -50.11% | -5.18% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 27.90% | -72.49% | -38.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLM and ETHD is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2024 | -0.56 |
The correlation between GXLM and ETHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.64 to -0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLM vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank
GXLM
ETHD
GXLM vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Stellar Lumens Trust (XLM) (GXLM) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXLM | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.11 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | -0.04 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | -0.07 | -0.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXLM vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLM drawdown since its inception was -94.01%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLM and ETHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLM | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.01% | -95.59% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.88% | -57.19% | -14.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.88% | -90.01% | +17.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.47% | -67.13% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.74% | 35.61% | +18.13% |
Volatility
GXLM vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grayscale Stellar Lumens Trust (XLM) (GXLM) is 23.86%, while ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a volatility of 28.94%. This indicates that GXLM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLM | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.86% | 28.94% | -5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.91% | 93.62% | -32.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.62% | 134.57% | -38.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 147.67% | 141.28% | +6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 147.67% | 141.28% | +6.39% |
Dividends
GXLM vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison
GXLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 5.82% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
GXLM Grayscale Stellar Lumens Trust (XLM) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXLM and ETHD have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHD has higher volatility (28.94%) compared to GXLM (23.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXLM dropped -94.01% vs ETHD's -95.59%.
On 1-year performance, ETHD leads with -2.31% vs -45.29% for GXLM. On volatility, GXLM has been the lower-risk option at 23.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHD has performed better with a -2.31% return vs -45.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 0.00% for GXLM.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and ProShares.
ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXLM and ETHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer