SSPY vs. QUS
SSPY (Stratified LargeCap Index ETF) and QUS (State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SSPY tracks the Syntax Stratified LargeCap Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SSPY returned 22.28% vs 19.80% for QUS. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SSPY charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
SSPY vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSPY achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 10.23% return.
SSPY
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 1Y
- 22.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.17%
QUS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 19.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.01M | $4.81M | $3.43M | |
| $83.98K | $164.94K | $170.20K |
SSPY vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SSPY Stratified LargeCap Index ETF | 14.08% | 12.88% | -0.90% |
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 10.23% | 14.13% | -0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSPY and QUS is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SSPY and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSPY vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSPY
QUS
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SSPY
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
SSPY
QUS
Healthcare
SSPY
QUS
Consumer Defensive
SSPY
QUS
Financial Services
SSPY
QUS
Industrials
SSPY
QUS
Utilities
SSPY
QUS
Energy
SSPY
QUS
Communication Services
SSPY
QUS
Real Estate
SSPY
QUS
Basic Materials
SSPY
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSPY vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
SSPY
QUS
SSPY vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stratified LargeCap Index ETF (SSPY) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSPY | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.90 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 12.95 | -1.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSPY vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSPY drawdown since its inception was -16.16%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSPY and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSPY | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -33.78% | +17.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.32% | -6.85% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -3.66% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 1.53% | +0.35% |
Volatility
SSPY vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Stratified LargeCap Index ETF (SSPY) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.42%. This indicates that SSPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSPY | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 2.42% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 6.97% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.72% | 9.22% | +1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 14.32% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 16.40% | -2.18% |
SSPY vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSPY has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSPY vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
SSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than QUS's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.27% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
SSPY Stratified LargeCap Index ETF | 1.21% | 1.38% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSPY and QUS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSPY has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to QUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSPY dropped -16.16% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 1-year performance, SSPY leads with 22.28% vs 19.80% for QUS. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SSPY has performed better with a 22.28% return vs 19.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SSPY.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.21% for SSPY.
SSPY tracks Syntax Stratified LargeCap Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SSPY and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSPY and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer