PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSO vs. USMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSO vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 2.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SSO has outperformed USMV with an annualized return of 24.02%, while USMV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.90% annualized return.


SSO

1D
1.03%
1M
0.12%
YTD
15.08%
6M
15.47%
1Y
47.12%
3Y*
34.18%
5Y*
18.57%
10Y*
24.02%

USMV

1D
0.43%
1M
1.43%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.34%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSO vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
15.08%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
2.43%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SSO and USMV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between SSO and USMV has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SSO vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SSO
USMV

Technology

25.7%
33.9%

Financial Services

24.1%
11.7%

Communication Services

7.0%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
5.7%

Healthcare

5.9%
12.6%

Industrials

5.3%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
9.4%

Energy

2.3%
2.7%

Utilities

1.7%
6.9%

Real Estate

1.3%
2.5%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.4%

Technology

SSO
25.7%
USMV
33.9%

Financial Services

SSO
24.1%
USMV
11.7%

Communication Services

SSO
7.0%
USMV
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SSO
6.4%
USMV
5.7%

Healthcare

SSO
5.9%
USMV
12.6%

Industrials

SSO
5.3%
USMV
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

SSO
3.2%
USMV
9.4%

Energy

SSO
2.3%
USMV
2.7%

Utilities

SSO
1.7%
USMV
6.9%

Real Estate

SSO
1.3%
USMV
2.5%

Basic Materials

SSO
1.2%
USMV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSO vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSO vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSOUSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.08

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

0.62

+1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

2.06

+8.31

SSO vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSO Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the USMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSO and USMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSO vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, which is greater than USMV's maximum drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and USMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSOUSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.67%

-33.10%

-51.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.17%

-6.46%

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

-9.36%

-25.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.73%

-17.93%

-28.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.34%

-33.10%

-26.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-1.40%

-3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.55%

-2.87%

-16.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

1.95%

+2.29%

Volatility

SSO vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.70%. This indicates that SSO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSOUSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.74%

2.70%

+6.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.17%

6.02%

+13.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.54%

8.56%

+15.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.78%

12.36%

+21.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.95%

14.51%

+21.44%

SSO vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSO vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than USMV's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.64%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.53%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSO and USMV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSO has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to USMV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSO dropped -84.67% vs USMV's -33.10%.

On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.02% vs 9.90% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.02% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.64% for SSO.

SSO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while USMV is Large Cap Blend Equities. SSO tracks S&P 500, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 0.15% for USMV.

SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSO and USMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer