PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSO vs. SAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSO vs. SAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly lower than SAA's 28.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SSO has outperformed SAA with an annualized return of 23.71%, while SAA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.19% annualized return.


SSO

1D
0.47%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
14.49%
6M
14.11%
1Y
45.16%
3Y*
35.32%
5Y*
18.74%
10Y*
23.71%

SAA

1D
1.21%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
28.45%
6M
27.82%
1Y
55.90%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*
11.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSO vs. SAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
14.49%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
28.45%0.29%5.60%21.32%-36.17%51.77%-1.79%42.39%-23.00%23.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SSO and SAA is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2007

0.78

The correlation between SSO and SAA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

SSO vs. SAA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SSO
SAA

Technology

35.6%
15.5%

Financial Services

11.8%
16.9%

Communication Services

11.2%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
13.4%

Healthcare

8.5%
11.0%

Industrials

8.3%
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.5%

Energy

3.5%
5.9%

Utilities

2.4%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
7.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
5.1%

Technology

SSO
35.6%
SAA
15.5%

Financial Services

SSO
11.8%
SAA
16.9%

Communication Services

SSO
11.2%
SAA
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SSO
10.1%
SAA
13.4%

Healthcare

SSO
8.5%
SAA
11.0%

Industrials

SSO
8.3%
SAA
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

SSO
4.9%
SAA
3.5%

Energy

SSO
3.5%
SAA
5.9%

Utilities

SSO
2.4%
SAA
2.0%

Real Estate

SSO
1.9%
SAA
7.7%

Basic Materials

SSO
1.8%
SAA
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSO vs. SAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SAA
SAA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSO vs. SAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSOSAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.09

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

9.94

+0.95

SSO vs. SAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSO Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the SAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSO and SAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSOSAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.56

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.02

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.24

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.18

+0.23

Drawdowns

SSO vs. SAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, roughly equal to the maximum SAA drawdown of -87.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and SAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSOSAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.67%

-87.39%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.17%

-18.21%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

-50.84%

+15.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.73%

-55.37%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.34%

-74.54%

+15.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

-4.18%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-27.41%

+7.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

5.64%

-1.48%

Volatility

SSO vs. SAA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is 7.49%, while ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) has a volatility of 9.06%. This indicates that SSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSOSAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.49%

9.06%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.61%

24.05%

-5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.14%

36.04%

-11.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.73%

43.56%

-9.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.94%

46.15%

-10.21%

SSO vs. SAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than SAA's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSO vs. SAA - Dividend Comparison

SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than SAA's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
0.79%1.05%1.36%0.88%0.46%0.00%0.03%0.35%0.27%0.00%0.14%0.00%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.64%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSO and SAA have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAA has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to SSO (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSO dropped -84.67% vs SAA's -87.39%.

On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 23.71% vs 11.19% for SAA. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 7.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 23.71% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SAA.

SAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.64% for SSO.

SSO tracks S&P 500, while SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 0.95% for SAA.

SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSO and SAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer