PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SSO vs. PUST.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

SSO vs. PUST.PA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA).

SSO and PUST.PA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SSO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. PUST.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on May 20, 2014. Both SSO and PUST.PA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SSO vs. PUST.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SSO vs. PUST.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500		-8.90%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%
PUST.PA
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc		-5.22%19.91%26.96%54.80%-33.98%29.29%48.09%37.68%-0.23%32.46%
Different Trading Currencies

SSO is traded in USD, while PUST.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PUST.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a -8.90% return, which is significantly lower than PUST.PA's -5.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SSO has outperformed PUST.PA with an annualized return of 21.24%, while PUST.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 18.80% annualized return.

SSO

1D
1.48%
1M
-9.07%
YTD
-8.90%
6M
-6.36%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
28.90%
5Y*
15.68%
10Y*
21.24%

PUST.PA

1D
2.92%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
-5.22%
6M
-2.51%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
18.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares Ultra S&P500

Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc

Often compared with SSO:
SSO vs. QLDSSO vs. SPYSSO vs. UPROSSO vs. VOOSSO vs. SPXLSSO vs. SPUUSSO vs. QQQ
Often compared with PUST.PA:
PUST.PA vs. LQQ.PAPUST.PA vs. WPEA.PAPUST.PA vs. XLKQ.LPUST.PA vs. BRK-BPUST.PA vs. ESE.PAPUST.PA vs. ^GSPCPUST.PA vs. MGC

SSO vs. PUST.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than PUST.PA's 0.30% expense ratio.

SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
PUST.PA
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc

Return for Risk

SSO vs. PUST.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
PUST.PA
PUST.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSO vs. PUST.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SSOPUST.PADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

1.17

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

1.75

-0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

3.27

-2.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.19

12.57

-7.38

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSO vs. PUST.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSO Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSO and PUST.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SSOPUST.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

1.17

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.61

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.93

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.88

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between SSO and PUST.PA is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SSO vs. PUST.PA - Dividend Comparison

SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while PUST.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500		0.81%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%
PUST.PA
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SSO vs. PUST.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, which is greater than PUST.PA's maximum drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and PUST.PA.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

SSOPUST.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.67%

-31.40%

-53.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.17%

-13.48%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.73%

-31.40%

-15.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.34%

-31.40%

-27.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.18%

-7.71%

-4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-5.95%

-13.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.44%

3.37%

+2.07%

Volatility

SSO vs. PUST.PA - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) at 5.57%. This indicates that SSO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUST.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

SSOPUST.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

5.57%

+5.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.99%

11.97%

+7.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.46%

20.53%

+15.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.66%

20.67%

+12.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.86%

20.01%

+15.85%