SSO vs. LINT
SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SSO is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SSO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
SSO vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 259.95% return.
SSO
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 37.35%
- 3Y*
- 30.77%
- 5Y*
- 17.16%
- 10Y*
- 23.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.64%
LINT
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -47.53%
- 6M
- 154.25%
- YTD
- 259.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.47M | $20.67M | $35.74M | |
| $177.82M | $191.16M | $223.05M |
SSO vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 16.14% | 6.47% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 259.95% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSO and LINT is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.48 |
SSO vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSO
LINT
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SSO
LINT
Financial Services
SSO
LINT
-
Communication Services
SSO
LINT
-
Healthcare
SSO
LINT
-
Consumer Cyclical
SSO
LINT
-
Industrials
SSO
LINT
-
Consumer Defensive
SSO
LINT
-
Energy
SSO
LINT
-
Utilities
SSO
LINT
-
Real Estate
SSO
LINT
-
Basic Materials
SSO
LINT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSO vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
SSO
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SSO vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSO | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSO vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSO | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.67% | -69.02% | -15.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.07% | -62.88% | +58.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.45% | -23.85% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | — | — |
Volatility
SSO vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSO | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.63% | 169.51% | -143.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 169.51% | -135.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.91% | 169.51% | -133.60% |
SSO vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSO vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than LINT's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.76% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSO and LINT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.67% for SSO.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for SSO and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer