SSO vs. CWEB
SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SSO tracks the S&P 500 while CWEB tracks the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSO returned 19.62%/yr vs -42.72%/yr for CWEB. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSO charges 0.87%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CWEB.
Performance
SSO vs. CWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 19.37% return, which is significantly higher than CWEB's -35.30% return.
SSO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 9.75%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 18.81%
- 1Y
- 52.69%
- 3Y*
- 37.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.62%
- 10Y*
- 24.21%
CWEB
- 1D
- 6.90%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -35.30%
- 6M
- -40.63%
- 1Y
- -28.50%
- 3Y*
- -8.05%
- 5Y*
- -42.72%
- 10Y*
- —
SSO vs. CWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 19.37% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -35.30% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSO and CWEB is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2016 | 0.47 |
SSO vs. CWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSO
CWEB
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SSO
CWEB
Financial Services
SSO
CWEB
Communication Services
SSO
CWEB
Consumer Cyclical
SSO
CWEB
Healthcare
SSO
CWEB
Industrials
SSO
CWEB
-
Consumer Defensive
SSO
CWEB
Energy
SSO
CWEB
-
Utilities
SSO
CWEB
-
Real Estate
SSO
CWEB
Basic Materials
SSO
CWEB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSO vs. CWEB — Risk / Return Rank
SSO
CWEB
SSO vs. CWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSO | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | -0.53 | +2.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.86 | -0.51 | +3.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.94 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | -0.44 | +3.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.80 | -0.84 | +13.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSO | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | -0.53 | +2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | -0.45 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | -0.24 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
SSO vs. CWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, smaller than the maximum CWEB drawdown of -98.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and CWEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSO | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.67% | -98.09% | +13.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | -60.58% | +42.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -60.58% | +25.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.73% | -95.63% | +48.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -97.37% | +95.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.57% | -65.41% | +45.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 31.59% | -27.46% |
Volatility
SSO vs. CWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is 5.66%, while Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a volatility of 21.38%. This indicates that SSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSO | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 21.38% | -15.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.78% | 39.48% | -21.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.60% | 53.90% | -30.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.65% | 94.47% | -60.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.89% | 80.68% | -44.79% |
SSO vs. CWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than CWEB's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSO vs. CWEB - Dividend Comparison
SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than CWEB's 5.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 5.22% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSO and CWEB have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (21.38%) compared to SSO (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSO dropped -84.67% vs CWEB's -98.09%.
On 5-year performance, SSO leads with 19.62% vs -42.72% for CWEB. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SSO has performed better with a 19.62% return vs -42.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 0.62% for SSO.
SSO tracks S&P 500, while CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 1.30% for CWEB.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSO and CWEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer