SSO vs. CWEB
SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while CWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSO returned 17.16%/yr vs -34.28%/yr for CWEB. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SSO charges 0.87%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CWEB.
Performance
SSO vs. CWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly higher than CWEB's -36.03% return.
SSO
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 37.35%
- 3Y*
- 30.77%
- 5Y*
- 17.16%
- 10Y*
- 23.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.64%
CWEB
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- 28.79%
- 6M
- -39.78%
- YTD
- -36.03%
- 1Y
- -33.46%
- 3Y*
- -15.58%
- 5Y*
- -34.28%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -19.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.22M | $13.80M | $17.15M | |
| $177.82M | $191.16M | $223.05M |
SSO vs. CWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 16.14% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -36.03% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSO and CWEB is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.47 |
SSO vs. CWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSO
CWEB
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SSO
CWEB
Financial Services
SSO
CWEB
Communication Services
SSO
CWEB
Healthcare
SSO
CWEB
Consumer Cyclical
SSO
CWEB
Industrials
SSO
CWEB
-
Consumer Defensive
SSO
CWEB
Energy
SSO
CWEB
-
Utilities
SSO
CWEB
-
Real Estate
SSO
CWEB
Basic Materials
SSO
CWEB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSO vs. CWEB — Risk / Return Rank
SSO
CWEB
SSO vs. CWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSO | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.91 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | -0.53 | +2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | -0.92 | +8.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSO vs. CWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, smaller than the maximum CWEB drawdown of -98.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and CWEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSO | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.67% | -98.18% | +13.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | -69.36% | +51.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -69.36% | +34.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.73% | -92.51% | +45.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.07% | -97.39% | +93.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.45% | -66.00% | +46.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 40.38% | -35.84% |
Volatility
SSO vs. CWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is 7.07%, while Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a volatility of 15.76%. This indicates that SSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSO | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 15.76% | -8.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.14% | 41.53% | -21.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.63% | 55.64% | -30.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 93.18% | -59.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.91% | 80.32% | -44.41% |
SSO vs. CWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than CWEB's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSO vs. CWEB - Dividend Comparison
SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than CWEB's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 5.68% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSO and CWEB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (15.76%) compared to SSO (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSO dropped -84.67% vs CWEB's -98.18%.
On 5-year performance, SSO leads with 17.16% vs -34.28% for CWEB. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SSO has performed better with a 17.16% return vs -34.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 0.67% for SSO.
SSO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CWEB is China Equities. SSO tracks S&P 500, while CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 1.30% for CWEB.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSO and CWEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer