PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSO vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSO vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSO achieves a 17.32% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -58.86% return.


SSO

1D
-1.53%
1M
1.94%
6M
13.10%
YTD
17.32%
1Y
37.37%
3Y*
32.47%
5Y*
17.61%
10Y*
23.27%

BITU

1D
-5.16%
1M
-6.57%
6M
-62.01%
YTD
-58.86%
1Y
-80.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSO vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
17.32%26.19%20.58%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-58.86%-37.07%41.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SSO and BITU is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSO vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSO vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSOBITUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.80

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

-0.97

+3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.51

-1.43

+9.94

SSO vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSO and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSO vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, roughly equal to the maximum BITU drawdown of -83.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and BITU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSOBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.67%

-83.45%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.17%

-83.45%

+65.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-81.60%

+78.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.49%

-36.56%

+17.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

56.22%

-51.82%

Volatility

SSO vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is 8.22%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 22.54%. This indicates that SSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSOBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.22%

22.54%

-14.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.91%

70.09%

-50.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.05%

88.23%

-63.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.87%

96.86%

-62.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.88%

96.86%

-60.98%

SSO vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSO vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than BITU's 93.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
93.76%50.23%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.67%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSO and BITU have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (22.54%) compared to SSO (8.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSO dropped -84.67% vs BITU's -83.45%.

On 1-year performance, SSO leads with 37.37% vs -80.42% for BITU. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 8.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SSO has performed better with a 37.37% return vs -80.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 93.76%, compared with 0.67% for SSO.

SSO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. SSO tracks S&P 500, while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 0.95% for BITU.

SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSO and BITU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer