PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSMGX vs. VMGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSMGX vs. VMGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund (VMGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSMGX achieves a 18.84% return, which is significantly higher than VMGRX's 4.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SSMGX has outperformed VMGRX with an annualized return of 11.24%, while VMGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.25% annualized return.


SSMGX

1D
2.34%
1M
0.84%
YTD
18.84%
6M
18.57%
1Y
34.08%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
11.24%

VMGRX

1D
0.12%
1M
7.12%
YTD
4.14%
6M
5.47%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
14.12%
5Y*
4.46%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSMGX vs. VMGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSMGX
SIT Small Cap Growth Fund
18.84%9.40%13.42%16.93%-25.59%15.80%35.97%29.19%-10.88%15.69%
VMGRX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund
4.14%8.80%17.73%24.15%-30.13%9.21%33.40%32.06%-3.52%21.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SSMGX and VMGRX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998

0.93

The correlation between SSMGX and VMGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSMGX vs. VMGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSMGX
SSMGX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SSMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VMGRX
VMGRX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VMGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VMGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSMGX vs. VMGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund (VMGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSMGXVMGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.12

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

0.66

+3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.76

2.06

+11.69

SSMGX vs. VMGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSMGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the VMGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSMGX and VMGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSMGXVMGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

0.67

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.19

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.46

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.36

+0.02

Drawdowns

SSMGX vs. VMGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMGX drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, smaller than the maximum VMGRX drawdown of -71.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMGX and VMGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSMGXVMGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.75%

-71.74%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-19.09%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.67%

-26.85%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.37%

-39.71%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.72%

-39.71%

+3.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

0.00%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.05%

-24.50%

+5.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

6.10%

-3.43%

Volatility

SSMGX vs. VMGRX - Volatility Comparison

SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund (VMGRX) at 4.23%. This indicates that SSMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSMGXVMGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

4.23%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

15.07%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.14%

18.91%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.86%

23.23%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

22.31%

-0.72%

SSMGX vs. VMGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMGX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VMGRX's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSMGX vs. VMGRX - Dividend Comparison

SSMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, less than VMGRX's 17.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSMGX
SIT Small Cap Growth Fund
4.61%5.48%4.69%3.13%1.73%15.89%3.44%3.14%9.80%6.81%0.17%10.68%
VMGRX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Fund
17.04%17.74%1.80%0.39%0.26%34.53%6.30%10.43%14.53%3.13%0.67%8.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSMGX and VMGRX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSMGX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to VMGRX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSMGX dropped -65.75% vs VMGRX's -71.74%.

SSMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSMGX and VMGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer