PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSMGX vs. SDMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSMGX vs. SDMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) and SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSMGX achieves a 19.99% return, which is significantly lower than SDMGX's 27.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SSMGX having a 11.52% annualized return and SDMGX not far behind at 11.32%.


SSMGX

1D
2.19%
1M
2.49%
YTD
19.99%
6M
17.08%
1Y
36.96%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
11.52%

SDMGX

1D
2.74%
1M
6.44%
YTD
27.12%
6M
29.40%
1Y
57.42%
3Y*
23.88%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSMGX vs. SDMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSMGX
SIT Small Cap Growth Fund
19.99%9.40%13.42%16.93%-25.59%15.80%35.97%29.19%-10.88%15.69%
SDMGX
SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund
27.12%36.11%13.58%7.37%-17.23%-8.88%23.14%19.77%-14.76%43.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SSMGX and SDMGX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 1995

0.64

The correlation between SSMGX and SDMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSMGX vs. SDMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSMGX
SSMGX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SSMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SDMGX
SDMGX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SDMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SDMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSMGX vs. SDMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) and SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSMGXSDMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.50

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

4.38

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.42

16.34

-2.92

SSMGX vs. SDMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the SDMGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSMGX and SDMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSMGX vs. SDMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMGX drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, roughly equal to the maximum SDMGX drawdown of -67.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMGX and SDMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSMGXSDMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.75%

-67.12%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-13.00%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.67%

-18.90%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.37%

-39.52%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.72%

-44.63%

+8.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.50%

+2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.02%

-23.57%

+4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.48%

-0.78%

Volatility

SSMGX vs. SDMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) is 6.63%, while SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX) has a volatility of 13.22%. This indicates that SSMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSMGXSDMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

13.22%

-6.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.74%

19.46%

-4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.69%

22.07%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

20.17%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.64%

19.70%

+1.94%

SSMGX vs. SDMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMGX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SDMGX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSMGX vs. SDMGX - Dividend Comparison

SSMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than SDMGX's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDMGX
SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund
0.69%0.87%4.13%2.03%2.44%2.13%0.26%1.75%1.67%1.45%0.27%3.13%
SSMGX
SIT Small Cap Growth Fund
4.57%5.48%4.69%3.13%1.73%15.89%3.44%3.14%9.80%6.81%0.17%10.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSMGX and SDMGX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDMGX has higher volatility (13.22%) compared to SSMGX (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSMGX dropped -65.75% vs SDMGX's -67.12%.

SDMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSMGX and SDMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer