SSMGX vs. ACRNX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) and Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX).

SSMGX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Jul 1, 1994. ACRNX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 10, 1970.

Performance

SSMGX vs. ACRNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) and Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SSMGX vs. ACRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SSMGX SIT Small Cap Growth Fund	1.24%	9.40%	13.42%	16.93%	-25.59%	15.80%	35.97%	29.19%	-10.88%	15.69%
ACRNX Columbia Acorn Fund	-9.00%	4.80%	14.46%	21.85%	-33.80%	8.62%	29.65%	26.65%	-8.82%	25.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSMGX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than ACRNX's -9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SSMGX has outperformed ACRNX with an annualized return of 9.55%, while ACRNX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.33% annualized return.

SSMGX

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: -9.50%
• YTD: 1.24%
• 6M: 3.23%
• 1Y: 23.28%
• 3Y*: 11.40%
• 5Y*: 3.28%
• 10Y*: 9.55%

ACRNX

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: -12.92%
• YTD: -9.00%
• 6M: -7.88%
• 1Y: 10.67%
• 3Y*: 6.52%
• 5Y*: -1.27%
• 10Y*: 7.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSMGX vs. ACRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMGX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ACRNX's 0.83% expense ratio.

SSMGX

SIT Small Cap Growth Fund

ACRNX

Columbia Acorn Fund

Return for Risk

SSMGX vs. ACRNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSMGX

SSMGX Risk / Return Rank: 60
SSMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SSMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SSMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SSMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SSMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

ACRNX

ACRNX Risk / Return Rank: 16
ACRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ACRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ACRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
ACRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ACRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSMGX vs. ACRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) and Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SSMGX	ACRNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	0.40	+0.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	0.72	+0.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.09	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	0.43	+1.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.49	1.61	+4.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSMGX vs. ACRNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the ACRNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSMGX and ACRNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SSMGX	ACRNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	0.40	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	-0.05	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.32	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.63	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between SSMGX and ACRNX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SSMGX vs. ACRNX - Dividend Comparison

SSMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, while ACRNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SSMGX SIT Small Cap Growth Fund	5.41%	5.48%	4.69%	3.13%	1.73%	15.89%	3.44%	3.14%	9.80%	6.81%	0.17%	10.68%
ACRNX Columbia Acorn Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.30%	26.17%	13.28%	11.43%	8.55%	23.63%	39.09%	63.48%

Drawdowns

SSMGX vs. ACRNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMGX drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, which is greater than ACRNX's maximum drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMGX and ACRNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSMGX	ACRNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.75%	-56.70%	-9.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.50%	-16.63%	+3.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.37%	-45.58%	+11.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.72%	-45.58%	+9.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.05%	-20.25%	+10.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.15%	-8.78%	-10.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	4.47%	-1.23%

Volatility

SSMGX vs. ACRNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SIT Small Cap Growth Fund (SSMGX) is 7.29%, while Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that SSMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSMGX	ACRNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.29%	7.83%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.65%	15.31%	-1.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.81%	24.40%	-1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.77%	24.85%	-3.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.51%	22.88%	-1.37%