SSMG vs. XMMO
SSMG (Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. SSMG is actively managed, while XMMO is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSMG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
SSMG vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SSMG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- YTD
- 16.42%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 26.60%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- 18.82%
SSMG vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF | 5.50% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSMG and XMMO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSMG vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
SSMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XMMO
SSMG vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSMG | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSMG vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSMG drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMG and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSMG | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -55.37% | +48.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.85% | -7.56% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -9.42% | +7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.55% | — |
Volatility
SSMG vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSMG | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.54% | 20.65% | +6.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.54% | 21.75% | +5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.54% | 22.34% | +5.20% |
SSMG vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSMG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSMG vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
SSMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SSMG and XMMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SSMG.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for SSMG.
SSMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SSMG and 0.35% for XMMO.
Find the right allocation for SSMG and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer