SSMG vs. VPC
SSMG (Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF) and VPC (Virtus Private Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while VPC is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Indxx Private Credit Index. SSMG is actively managed, while VPC is passively managed. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SSMG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VPC.
Performance
SSMG vs. VPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SSMG
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VPC
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- 6M
- -5.83%
- YTD
- -8.90%
- 1Y
- -13.59%
- 3Y*
- -0.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.28%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.89K | $3.26K | $5.76K | |
| $191.61K | $173.10K | $170.99K |
SSMG vs. VPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF | 7.79% |
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF | -1.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSMG and VPC is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSMG vs. VPC — Risk / Return Rank
SSMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VPC
SSMG vs. VPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSMG | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.85 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSMG vs. VPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSMG drawdown since its inception was -13.72%, smaller than the maximum VPC drawdown of -53.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMG and VPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSMG | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -53.45% | +39.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -19.31% | +14.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -7.97% | +4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.59% | — |
Volatility
SSMG vs. VPC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSMG | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.58% | 13.90% | +14.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 13.62% | +14.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 20.42% | +8.16% |
SSMG vs. VPC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSMG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than VPC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSMG vs. VPC - Dividend Comparison
SSMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF | 15.99% | 14.33% | 11.26% | 11.71% | 10.74% | 6.31% | 10.06% | 8.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSMG and VPC have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSMG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSMG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VPC.
VPC has the higher dividend yield at 15.99%, compared with 0.00% for SSMG.
SSMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VPC is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SSMG and 0.75% for VPC.
Find the right allocation for SSMG and VPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer