SSMG vs. PFFR
SSMG (Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF) and PFFR (InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while PFFR is a REIT fund tracking the Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. SSMG is actively managed, while PFFR is passively managed. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SSMG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFFR.
Performance
SSMG vs. PFFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SSMG
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PFFR
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 3.30%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $760.67K | $712.18K | $614.39K | |
| $5.89K | $3.26K | $5.76K |
SSMG vs. PFFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF | 7.79% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSMG and PFFR is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSMG vs. PFFR — Risk / Return Rank
SSMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PFFR
SSMG vs. PFFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSMG | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSMG vs. PFFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSMG drawdown since its inception was -13.72%, smaller than the maximum PFFR drawdown of -53.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMG and PFFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSMG | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -53.02% | +39.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -0.65% | -4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -6.90% | +3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.91% | — |
Volatility
SSMG vs. PFFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSMG | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.58% | 8.10% | +20.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 10.54% | +18.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 20.37% | +8.21% |
SSMG vs. PFFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSMG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFR's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSMG vs. PFFR - Dividend Comparison
SSMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PFFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 8.24% | 7.99% | 7.78% | 7.72% | 8.60% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 6.59% |
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSMG and PFFR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSMG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSMG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFFR.
PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.24%, compared with 0.00% for SSMG.
SSMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PFFR is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SSMG and 0.45% for PFFR.
Find the right allocation for SSMG and PFFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer