PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSMG vs. ASGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSMG vs. ASGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SSMG

1D
-0.20%
1M
-4.80%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASGM

1D
0.13%
1M
-2.53%
6M
12.52%
YTD
17.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSMG vs. ASGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SSMG and ASGM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSMG vs. ASGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SSMG vs. ASGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSMG vs. ASGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMG drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, which is greater than ASGM's maximum drawdown of -6.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMG and ASGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSMGASGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-6.62%

-0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.85%

-4.38%

-2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-1.58%

-0.43%

Volatility

SSMG vs. ASGM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSMGASGMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.54%

16.80%

+10.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.54%

16.80%

+10.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.54%

16.80%

+10.74%

SSMG vs. ASGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGM's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSMG vs. ASGM - Dividend Comparison

SSMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SSMG and ASGM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SSMG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSMG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for ASGM.

ASGM has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.00% for SSMG.

SSMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while ASGM is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SSMG and 0.86% for ASGM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSMG and ASGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer